Features of public open spaces and physical activity among children: Findings from the CLAN study

A. Timperio, Billie Giles-Corti, D. Crawford, N. Andrianopoulos, K. Ball, J. Salmon, C. Hume

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)
1095 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To examine associations between features of public open spaces, and children's physical activity. Participants: 163 children aged 8–9 years and 334 adolescents aged 13–15 years from Melbourne, Australia participated in 2004. Methods: A Geographic Information System was used to identify all public open spaces (POS) within 800 m of participants' homes and their closest POS. The features of all POS identified were audited in 2004/5. Accelerometers measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) after school and on weekends. Linear regression analyses examined associations between features of the closest POS and participants' MVPA. Results: Most participants had a POS within 800 m of their home. The presence of playgrounds was positively associated with younger boys' weekend MVPA (B = 24.9 min/day; p ≤ 0.05), and lighting along paths was inversely associated with weekend MVPA (B = − 54.9 min/day; p ≤ 0.05). The number of recreational facilities was inversely associated with younger girls' MVPA after school (B = − 2.6 min/day; p ≤ 0.05) and on the weekend (B = − 8.7 min/day; p ≤ 0.05). The presence of trees providing shade (5.8 min/day, p ≤ 0.01) and signage regarding dogs (B = 6.8 min/day, p ≤ 0.05) were positively associated with adolescent girls' MVPA after school. Conclusion: Certain features of POS were associated with participants' MVPA, although mixed associations were evident. Further research is required to clarify these complex relationships.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)514-518
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Features of public open spaces and physical activity among children: Findings from the CLAN study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this