TY - JOUR
T1 - Fatigue After Stroke Educational Recovery Program
T2 - A Prospective, Phase III, Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - Jones, Kelly
AU - Krishnamurthi, Rita
AU - Barker-Collo, Suzanne
AU - De Silva, Sulekha
AU - Henry, Nathan
AU - Zeng, Irene
AU - Vorster, Anja
AU - Te Ao, Braden
AU - Green, Geoff
AU - Ratnasabapathy, Yogini
AU - Feigin, Valery
PY - 2025/1/7
Y1 - 2025/1/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: Poststroke fatigue affects ≈50% of patients with stroke, causing significant personal, societal, and economic burden. In the FASTER (Fatigue After Stroke Educational Recovery) study, we assessed a group-based educational intervention for poststroke fatigue.METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred patients with clinically significant fatigue were included and randomized to either a general stroke education control or fatigue management group (FMG) intervention and assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months. The FMG involved weekly psychoeducation sessions over 6 weeks. Coprimary outcomes were the Fatigue Severity Scale and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 total scores. Adjusted mean total Fatigue Severity Scale scores at 6 weeks (primary end point) were nearly identical for the education control and FMG groups. The adjusted mean difference between treatment groups was -0.13 (SE, 1.4; P=0.92) at 6 weeks and 1.67 (SE, 1.4; P=0.26) at 3 months. Although there were no significant effects, Fatigue Severity Scale outcomes were in the direction of a treatment effect based on the estimated change. Adjusted mean total Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 scores at 6 weeks (primary end point) were similar for the education control and FMG groups. The adjusted mean difference between treatment groups was -0.91 (SE, 1.54; P=0.55) at 6 weeks and -1.26 (SE, 1.8; P=0.49) at 3 months. Both groups had similar secondary outcomes (eg, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 subscales, sleep, pain, mood, quality of life) at 6 weeks and 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of significant group-level benefits of FMG over and above general stroke education. Educational group-based interventions for poststroke fatigue should continue to be refined and examined, including consideration of potential impacts at an individual level.REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/; UnIque identifier: ACTRN12619000626167.
AB - BACKGROUND: Poststroke fatigue affects ≈50% of patients with stroke, causing significant personal, societal, and economic burden. In the FASTER (Fatigue After Stroke Educational Recovery) study, we assessed a group-based educational intervention for poststroke fatigue.METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred patients with clinically significant fatigue were included and randomized to either a general stroke education control or fatigue management group (FMG) intervention and assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months. The FMG involved weekly psychoeducation sessions over 6 weeks. Coprimary outcomes were the Fatigue Severity Scale and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 total scores. Adjusted mean total Fatigue Severity Scale scores at 6 weeks (primary end point) were nearly identical for the education control and FMG groups. The adjusted mean difference between treatment groups was -0.13 (SE, 1.4; P=0.92) at 6 weeks and 1.67 (SE, 1.4; P=0.26) at 3 months. Although there were no significant effects, Fatigue Severity Scale outcomes were in the direction of a treatment effect based on the estimated change. Adjusted mean total Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 scores at 6 weeks (primary end point) were similar for the education control and FMG groups. The adjusted mean difference between treatment groups was -0.91 (SE, 1.54; P=0.55) at 6 weeks and -1.26 (SE, 1.8; P=0.49) at 3 months. Both groups had similar secondary outcomes (eg, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 subscales, sleep, pain, mood, quality of life) at 6 weeks and 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of significant group-level benefits of FMG over and above general stroke education. Educational group-based interventions for poststroke fatigue should continue to be refined and examined, including consideration of potential impacts at an individual level.REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/; UnIque identifier: ACTRN12619000626167.
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.124.034441
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.124.034441
M3 - Article
C2 - 39719403
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 14
SP - e034441
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 1
M1 - e034441
ER -