Fairness of performance evaluation procedures and job satisfaction: the role of outcome-based and non-outcome-based effects

Chong Lau, K.M. Wong, R.C. Eggleton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior management accounting studies on fairness perceptions have overlooked two important issues. First, no prior management accounting studies have investigated how procedural fairness, by itself, affects managers' job satisfaction. Second, management accounting researchers have not demonstrated how conflicting theories on procedural fairness can be integrated and explained in a coherent manner. Our Model proposes that fairness of procedures for performance evaluation affects job satisfaction through two distinct processes. The First is Outcome-based through fairness of outcomes (distributive fairness). The second is non-outcome-based through trust in Superior and organisational commitment. Based on a sample of 110 managers, the results indicate that while procedural fairness perceptions affect job satisfaction through both processes, the non-outcome-based process is much stronger than the outcome-based process. These results may be used to develop a unified theory on procedural fairness effects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-135
JournalAccounting and Business Research
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Performance evaluation
Fairness
Job satisfaction
Procedural fairness
Management accounting
Managers
Fairness perceptions
Organizational commitment
Integrated

Cite this

@article{b1b3d8cbb1fd4c1e8158d9565733f840,
title = "Fairness of performance evaluation procedures and job satisfaction: the role of outcome-based and non-outcome-based effects",
abstract = "Prior management accounting studies on fairness perceptions have overlooked two important issues. First, no prior management accounting studies have investigated how procedural fairness, by itself, affects managers' job satisfaction. Second, management accounting researchers have not demonstrated how conflicting theories on procedural fairness can be integrated and explained in a coherent manner. Our Model proposes that fairness of procedures for performance evaluation affects job satisfaction through two distinct processes. The First is Outcome-based through fairness of outcomes (distributive fairness). The second is non-outcome-based through trust in Superior and organisational commitment. Based on a sample of 110 managers, the results indicate that while procedural fairness perceptions affect job satisfaction through both processes, the non-outcome-based process is much stronger than the outcome-based process. These results may be used to develop a unified theory on procedural fairness effects.",
author = "Chong Lau and K.M. Wong and R.C. Eggleton",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/00014788.2008.9663325",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "121--135",
journal = "Accounting and Business Research",
issn = "0001-4788",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Fairness of performance evaluation procedures and job satisfaction: the role of outcome-based and non-outcome-based effects. / Lau, Chong; Wong, K.M.; Eggleton, R.C.

In: Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2008, p. 121-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fairness of performance evaluation procedures and job satisfaction: the role of outcome-based and non-outcome-based effects

AU - Lau, Chong

AU - Wong, K.M.

AU - Eggleton, R.C.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Prior management accounting studies on fairness perceptions have overlooked two important issues. First, no prior management accounting studies have investigated how procedural fairness, by itself, affects managers' job satisfaction. Second, management accounting researchers have not demonstrated how conflicting theories on procedural fairness can be integrated and explained in a coherent manner. Our Model proposes that fairness of procedures for performance evaluation affects job satisfaction through two distinct processes. The First is Outcome-based through fairness of outcomes (distributive fairness). The second is non-outcome-based through trust in Superior and organisational commitment. Based on a sample of 110 managers, the results indicate that while procedural fairness perceptions affect job satisfaction through both processes, the non-outcome-based process is much stronger than the outcome-based process. These results may be used to develop a unified theory on procedural fairness effects.

AB - Prior management accounting studies on fairness perceptions have overlooked two important issues. First, no prior management accounting studies have investigated how procedural fairness, by itself, affects managers' job satisfaction. Second, management accounting researchers have not demonstrated how conflicting theories on procedural fairness can be integrated and explained in a coherent manner. Our Model proposes that fairness of procedures for performance evaluation affects job satisfaction through two distinct processes. The First is Outcome-based through fairness of outcomes (distributive fairness). The second is non-outcome-based through trust in Superior and organisational commitment. Based on a sample of 110 managers, the results indicate that while procedural fairness perceptions affect job satisfaction through both processes, the non-outcome-based process is much stronger than the outcome-based process. These results may be used to develop a unified theory on procedural fairness effects.

U2 - 10.1080/00014788.2008.9663325

DO - 10.1080/00014788.2008.9663325

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 121

EP - 135

JO - Accounting and Business Research

JF - Accounting and Business Research

SN - 0001-4788

IS - 2

ER -