Factors influencing the use of decision support tools in the development and design of conservation policy

Fiona L. Gibson, Abbie A. Rogers, Anthony D M Smith, Anna Roberts, Hugh Possingham, Michael McCarthy, David J. Pannell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)
187 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There are many examples of decision support tools used to analyse information with the intention of assisting conservation managers and policy makers in their decision making. We used structured interviews to collect information on seven case studies from Australia and New Zealand to identify the factors that led to the use (or non-use) of decision support tools when developing conservation policies. The interviews explored hypotheses derived from existing literature on the use of decision support tools in conservation policy. Qualitative analysis of the interviews indicated that key factors influencing the uptake of a decision support tool in conservation policy include the alignment of the tool with the objectives and context of a policy, and its ability to be useful even in the presence of missing data. Two other factors that had been suggested in past literature were not perceived by interviewees to be as important as the above two: the presence of a champion for the decision support tool within the management agency, and the time required to apply the tool. The interviews also revealed a number of additional factors that influenced use or non-use of decision support tools that we had not extracted from existing literature: ambiguity about policy objectives, the autonomy of the agency, and the employee time costs of applying the decision support tool.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume70
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

conservation
interview
qualitative analysis
decision
conservation policy
autonomy
decision making
New Zealand
employee
manager
cost
policy
ability
costs
management
literature

Cite this

@article{154bc78ced0f43ab93c2aa8046c9c5c0,
title = "Factors influencing the use of decision support tools in the development and design of conservation policy",
abstract = "There are many examples of decision support tools used to analyse information with the intention of assisting conservation managers and policy makers in their decision making. We used structured interviews to collect information on seven case studies from Australia and New Zealand to identify the factors that led to the use (or non-use) of decision support tools when developing conservation policies. The interviews explored hypotheses derived from existing literature on the use of decision support tools in conservation policy. Qualitative analysis of the interviews indicated that key factors influencing the uptake of a decision support tool in conservation policy include the alignment of the tool with the objectives and context of a policy, and its ability to be useful even in the presence of missing data. Two other factors that had been suggested in past literature were not perceived by interviewees to be as important as the above two: the presence of a champion for the decision support tool within the management agency, and the time required to apply the tool. The interviews also revealed a number of additional factors that influenced use or non-use of decision support tools that we had not extracted from existing literature: ambiguity about policy objectives, the autonomy of the agency, and the employee time costs of applying the decision support tool.",
keywords = "Conservation policy, Decision making, Decision support tools, Marxan",
author = "Gibson, {Fiona L.} and Rogers, {Abbie A.} and Smith, {Anthony D M} and Anna Roberts and Hugh Possingham and Michael McCarthy and Pannell, {David J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2017.01.002",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Environmental Science & Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Factors influencing the use of decision support tools in the development and design of conservation policy. / Gibson, Fiona L.; Rogers, Abbie A.; Smith, Anthony D M; Roberts, Anna; Possingham, Hugh; McCarthy, Michael; Pannell, David J.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 70, 01.04.2017, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors influencing the use of decision support tools in the development and design of conservation policy

AU - Gibson, Fiona L.

AU - Rogers, Abbie A.

AU - Smith, Anthony D M

AU - Roberts, Anna

AU - Possingham, Hugh

AU - McCarthy, Michael

AU - Pannell, David J.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - There are many examples of decision support tools used to analyse information with the intention of assisting conservation managers and policy makers in their decision making. We used structured interviews to collect information on seven case studies from Australia and New Zealand to identify the factors that led to the use (or non-use) of decision support tools when developing conservation policies. The interviews explored hypotheses derived from existing literature on the use of decision support tools in conservation policy. Qualitative analysis of the interviews indicated that key factors influencing the uptake of a decision support tool in conservation policy include the alignment of the tool with the objectives and context of a policy, and its ability to be useful even in the presence of missing data. Two other factors that had been suggested in past literature were not perceived by interviewees to be as important as the above two: the presence of a champion for the decision support tool within the management agency, and the time required to apply the tool. The interviews also revealed a number of additional factors that influenced use or non-use of decision support tools that we had not extracted from existing literature: ambiguity about policy objectives, the autonomy of the agency, and the employee time costs of applying the decision support tool.

AB - There are many examples of decision support tools used to analyse information with the intention of assisting conservation managers and policy makers in their decision making. We used structured interviews to collect information on seven case studies from Australia and New Zealand to identify the factors that led to the use (or non-use) of decision support tools when developing conservation policies. The interviews explored hypotheses derived from existing literature on the use of decision support tools in conservation policy. Qualitative analysis of the interviews indicated that key factors influencing the uptake of a decision support tool in conservation policy include the alignment of the tool with the objectives and context of a policy, and its ability to be useful even in the presence of missing data. Two other factors that had been suggested in past literature were not perceived by interviewees to be as important as the above two: the presence of a champion for the decision support tool within the management agency, and the time required to apply the tool. The interviews also revealed a number of additional factors that influenced use or non-use of decision support tools that we had not extracted from existing literature: ambiguity about policy objectives, the autonomy of the agency, and the employee time costs of applying the decision support tool.

KW - Conservation policy

KW - Decision making

KW - Decision support tools

KW - Marxan

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010016489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.01.002

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Environmental Science & Policy

JF - Environmental Science & Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -