External Funding and Firm Growth: Comparing Female- and Male-Controlled SMEs

John Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research suggests a lack of external funding opportunities might inhibit thegrowth of many small and medium enterprises (SMEs), particularly female-controlled SMEs.However, the existing empirical research on this issue is extremely limited. The aim of this study,therefore, is to gain a better understanding of the relationship between SME growth and externalfunding and, in particular, to determine if there are any significant differences between femaleandmale-controlled SMEs. The study is based on a large (2 367 SMEs) highly representativelongitudinal (four-year) database provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The resultsindicate that female-controlled SMEs have relatively lower levels of external funding than theirmale counterparts, with the difference being greater in older compared to younger firms. Further,the analysis suggests that pecking order theory, rather than bank discrimination, might be theprimary cause of this difference. However, the results also indicate that the relatively lower levelsof external funding in female-controlled SMEs does not appear to be inhibiting their growth(relative to male-controlled SMEs). The results suggest that profitability is the most significantdeterminant of firm growth.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-49
JournalVenture Capital
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'External Funding and Firm Growth: Comparing Female- and Male-Controlled SMEs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this