Exploring the neural substrates of misinformation processing

Andrew Gordon, Jonathan C.W. Brooks, Susanne Quadflieg, Ullrich K.H. Ecker, Stephan Lewandowsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is well known that information that is initially thought to be correct but then revealed to be false, often continues to influence human judgement and decision making despite people being aware of the retraction. Yet little research has examined the underlying neural substrates of this phenomenon, which is known as the ‘continued influence effect of misinformation’ (CIEM). It remains unclear how the human brain processes critical information that retracts prior claims. To address this question in further detail, 26 healthy adults underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while listening to brief narratives which either involved a retraction of prior information or not. Following each narrative, subjects’ comprehension of the narrative, including their inclination to rely on retracted information, was probed. As expected, it was found that retracted information continued to affect participants’ narrative-related reasoning. In addition, the fMRI data indicated that the continued influence of retracted information may be due to a breakdown of narrative-level integration and coherence-building mechanisms implemented by the precuneus and posterior cingulate gyrus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-224
Number of pages9
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume106
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Communication
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Parietal Lobe
Gyrus Cinguli
Decision Making
Brain
Research

Cite this

Gordon, Andrew ; Brooks, Jonathan C.W. ; Quadflieg, Susanne ; Ecker, Ullrich K.H. ; Lewandowsky, Stephan. / Exploring the neural substrates of misinformation processing. In: Neuropsychologia. 2017 ; Vol. 106. pp. 216-224.
@article{51a6805bbeb441349b428c0f2c518a9d,
title = "Exploring the neural substrates of misinformation processing",
abstract = "It is well known that information that is initially thought to be correct but then revealed to be false, often continues to influence human judgement and decision making despite people being aware of the retraction. Yet little research has examined the underlying neural substrates of this phenomenon, which is known as the ‘continued influence effect of misinformation’ (CIEM). It remains unclear how the human brain processes critical information that retracts prior claims. To address this question in further detail, 26 healthy adults underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while listening to brief narratives which either involved a retraction of prior information or not. Following each narrative, subjects’ comprehension of the narrative, including their inclination to rely on retracted information, was probed. As expected, it was found that retracted information continued to affect participants’ narrative-related reasoning. In addition, the fMRI data indicated that the continued influence of retracted information may be due to a breakdown of narrative-level integration and coherence-building mechanisms implemented by the precuneus and posterior cingulate gyrus.",
keywords = "Continued influence effect, Memory updating, Misinformation",
author = "Andrew Gordon and Brooks, {Jonathan C.W.} and Susanne Quadflieg and Ecker, {Ullrich K.H.} and Stephan Lewandowsky",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.003",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "216--224",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Exploring the neural substrates of misinformation processing. / Gordon, Andrew; Brooks, Jonathan C.W.; Quadflieg, Susanne; Ecker, Ullrich K.H.; Lewandowsky, Stephan.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 106, 01.11.2017, p. 216-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the neural substrates of misinformation processing

AU - Gordon, Andrew

AU - Brooks, Jonathan C.W.

AU - Quadflieg, Susanne

AU - Ecker, Ullrich K.H.

AU - Lewandowsky, Stephan

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - It is well known that information that is initially thought to be correct but then revealed to be false, often continues to influence human judgement and decision making despite people being aware of the retraction. Yet little research has examined the underlying neural substrates of this phenomenon, which is known as the ‘continued influence effect of misinformation’ (CIEM). It remains unclear how the human brain processes critical information that retracts prior claims. To address this question in further detail, 26 healthy adults underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while listening to brief narratives which either involved a retraction of prior information or not. Following each narrative, subjects’ comprehension of the narrative, including their inclination to rely on retracted information, was probed. As expected, it was found that retracted information continued to affect participants’ narrative-related reasoning. In addition, the fMRI data indicated that the continued influence of retracted information may be due to a breakdown of narrative-level integration and coherence-building mechanisms implemented by the precuneus and posterior cingulate gyrus.

AB - It is well known that information that is initially thought to be correct but then revealed to be false, often continues to influence human judgement and decision making despite people being aware of the retraction. Yet little research has examined the underlying neural substrates of this phenomenon, which is known as the ‘continued influence effect of misinformation’ (CIEM). It remains unclear how the human brain processes critical information that retracts prior claims. To address this question in further detail, 26 healthy adults underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while listening to brief narratives which either involved a retraction of prior information or not. Following each narrative, subjects’ comprehension of the narrative, including their inclination to rely on retracted information, was probed. As expected, it was found that retracted information continued to affect participants’ narrative-related reasoning. In addition, the fMRI data indicated that the continued influence of retracted information may be due to a breakdown of narrative-level integration and coherence-building mechanisms implemented by the precuneus and posterior cingulate gyrus.

KW - Continued influence effect

KW - Memory updating

KW - Misinformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030786512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.003

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 216

EP - 224

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

ER -