Exploring current Chinese higher education pedagogic tensions through an activity theory lens

Llandis Barratt-Pugh, Fang Zhao, Zhaoyong Zhang, Shasha Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)


In this paper we investigate the current tensions for pedagogic change in the Chinese higher education system, and explore how the intricate interplay between the stakeholder relationships drives and mediates the system, and impacts on potential pedagogy. To achieve these goals, this study takes an inductive theory-building approach to gather the unique perceptions of 66 Chinese academics, and critically analyses the findings based through an Activity Theory framework. The findings indicate that institutional pedagogy is driven generally by regulated knowledge sources, knowledge dissemination, student compliance, parental expectations, examination achievement and pastoral care. The academics were enthusiastic about introducing more interactive, self-paced, authentic and web-based pedagogy, but continually indicated how traditional practice, social expectations, local regulations and economic restraints would frustrate reforming practices. The findings also show how pedagogic reform confronts existing subjectivity, and emphasise the importance of building and disseminating a rationale for changing prior to any pedagogic innovation. The Activity Theory framework demonstrates how potential pedagogic change has to be preceded by changing the understanding of stakeholders about the new goals and practices of learning. This study and the results have important implications for restructuring and reforming Chinese higher education system to meet future global and societal demands.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)831-852
Number of pages22
JournalHigher Education
Issue number5
Early online date21 Aug 2018
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring current Chinese higher education pedagogic tensions through an activity theory lens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this