Exercise Medicine in the Management of Pancreatic Cancer A Systematic Review

Hao Luo, Daniel A. Galvão, Robert U. Newton, Pedro Lopez, Colin Tang, Ciaran M. Fairman, Nigel Spry, Dennis R. Taaffe

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the health-related effects of exercise in patients with pancreatic cancer (PanCa) through a systematic review of current evidence. Studies were obtained through searching PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Library databases with additional hand searches. All intervention-based studies were included if it involved (1) adult patients with PanCa, (2) exercise training, and (3) findings in quality of life, cancer-related fatigue, psychological distress, and physical function. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42020154684. Seven trials described in 9 publications were included consisting of 201 patients with early-stage and advanced PanCa. Participants were required to perform supervised and/or home-based, low- to moderate-intensity resistance and/or aerobic exercise for 12 to 35 weeks or duration of neoadjuvant therapy. There were no exercise-related adverse events with a reported retention rate of 71% to 90% and exercise attendance of 64% to 96%. The programs were consistently associated with improvements in cancer-related fatigue, psychological distress, and physical function, with mixed effects on quality of life. Exercise training seems to be safe and feasible and may have a beneficial effect on various physical and psychological outcomes in patients with PanCa. Further work with rigorous study designs is required to consolidate and advance current findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)280-292
Number of pages13
JournalPancreas
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exercise Medicine in the Management of Pancreatic Cancer A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this