Evoked potentials, saccadic velocities, and computerised tomography in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

F. L. Mastaglia, J. L. Black, L. A. Cala, D. W.K. Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One hundred and two patients with suspected or established multiple sclerosis (MS) were investigated by one or more of the following techniques: measurement of visual evoked potentials (VEP); measurement of cervical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP); measurement of horizontal saccadic eye movement velocities (SV); and computerised axial tomography of the cranium and orbits (CT). Each of the techniques was valuable in detecting abnormalities, some of which were subclinical, in many patients. More abnormalities were found in patients studied by more than one technique, the most being detected in patients who were studied by all five techniques. We conclude that the techniques have a complementary role in investigating suspected MS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1315-1317
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume1
Issue number6072
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1977
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
Multiple Sclerosis
Tomography
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Visual Evoked Potentials
Saccades
Orbit
Skull

Cite this

@article{d191cf730be749a78bba287198fbd570,
title = "Evoked potentials, saccadic velocities, and computerised tomography in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis",
abstract = "One hundred and two patients with suspected or established multiple sclerosis (MS) were investigated by one or more of the following techniques: measurement of visual evoked potentials (VEP); measurement of cervical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP); measurement of horizontal saccadic eye movement velocities (SV); and computerised axial tomography of the cranium and orbits (CT). Each of the techniques was valuable in detecting abnormalities, some of which were subclinical, in many patients. More abnormalities were found in patients studied by more than one technique, the most being detected in patients who were studied by all five techniques. We conclude that the techniques have a complementary role in investigating suspected MS.",
author = "Mastaglia, {F. L.} and Black, {J. L.} and Cala, {L. A.} and Collins, {D. W.K.}",
year = "1977",
doi = "10.1136/bmj.1.6072.1315",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "1315--1317",
journal = "BMJ: British Medical Journal",
issn = "0959-535X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6072",

}

Evoked potentials, saccadic velocities, and computerised tomography in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. / Mastaglia, F. L.; Black, J. L.; Cala, L. A.; Collins, D. W.K.

In: British Medical Journal, Vol. 1, No. 6072, 1977, p. 1315-1317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evoked potentials, saccadic velocities, and computerised tomography in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

AU - Mastaglia, F. L.

AU - Black, J. L.

AU - Cala, L. A.

AU - Collins, D. W.K.

PY - 1977

Y1 - 1977

N2 - One hundred and two patients with suspected or established multiple sclerosis (MS) were investigated by one or more of the following techniques: measurement of visual evoked potentials (VEP); measurement of cervical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP); measurement of horizontal saccadic eye movement velocities (SV); and computerised axial tomography of the cranium and orbits (CT). Each of the techniques was valuable in detecting abnormalities, some of which were subclinical, in many patients. More abnormalities were found in patients studied by more than one technique, the most being detected in patients who were studied by all five techniques. We conclude that the techniques have a complementary role in investigating suspected MS.

AB - One hundred and two patients with suspected or established multiple sclerosis (MS) were investigated by one or more of the following techniques: measurement of visual evoked potentials (VEP); measurement of cervical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP); measurement of horizontal saccadic eye movement velocities (SV); and computerised axial tomography of the cranium and orbits (CT). Each of the techniques was valuable in detecting abnormalities, some of which were subclinical, in many patients. More abnormalities were found in patients studied by more than one technique, the most being detected in patients who were studied by all five techniques. We conclude that the techniques have a complementary role in investigating suspected MS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017408215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.1.6072.1315

DO - 10.1136/bmj.1.6072.1315

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 1315

EP - 1317

JO - BMJ: British Medical Journal

JF - BMJ: British Medical Journal

SN - 0959-535X

IS - 6072

ER -