TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of a novel nicotine inhaler device: Part 2-effect on craving and smoking urges
AU - Moyses, C.
AU - Hearn, A.
AU - Redfern, Andrew
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - © The Author 2014. Introduction: Many smokers find currently available nicotine replacement therapies unsatisfactory. The pharmacokinetics of nicotine delivered via a novel inhaler device, and its effect on craving satiation and smoking urges, were compared with the Nicorette® Inhalator (10 mg). Methods: Results are reported for Parts B (N = 24) and D (N = 24) of a 4-part Phase I study. Participants (18-55 years, ≥ 10 cigarettes/day within 1 hr of waking, expired carbon monoxide > 10 ppm on screening) received single doses of nicotine on consecutive days (0.45 and 0.67 mg [Part B] and 0.45 mg [Part D] via the novel device; 10 mg via Nicorette® [Parts B and D]). Venous pharmacokinetics, craving, and tolerability were assessed. Results: In Part B, the novel device 0.45 and 0.67 mg produced significantly lower Cmax, AUClast, and AUCall than Nicorette® (all p ≤ .05), higher AUC0-10 and significantly shorter Tmax (18.7 and 19.2 min vs. 38.0 min, respectively, p ≥ .05). Craving score AUC was lower for the novel device 0.45 mg than for Nicorette® in Part B (1356.3 vs. 1566.3, p = .029) and approached statistical significance in Part D (1208.5 vs. 1402.3 [p = .059]). Mean craving scores were lower for the novel device 0.45 mg than Nicorette® at 7/8 postdose timepoints in Part B (p ≤ .05 at 180 and 240 min) and at all timepoints in Part D (p ≤ .05 at 2, 4, and 10 min). Conclusions: The novel device was at least as effective as the Nicorette® Inhalator (10 mg) in relieving craving and smoking urges and was statistically superior at certain timepoints and in an overall craving AUC analysis, despite lower total nicotine exposure.
AB - © The Author 2014. Introduction: Many smokers find currently available nicotine replacement therapies unsatisfactory. The pharmacokinetics of nicotine delivered via a novel inhaler device, and its effect on craving satiation and smoking urges, were compared with the Nicorette® Inhalator (10 mg). Methods: Results are reported for Parts B (N = 24) and D (N = 24) of a 4-part Phase I study. Participants (18-55 years, ≥ 10 cigarettes/day within 1 hr of waking, expired carbon monoxide > 10 ppm on screening) received single doses of nicotine on consecutive days (0.45 and 0.67 mg [Part B] and 0.45 mg [Part D] via the novel device; 10 mg via Nicorette® [Parts B and D]). Venous pharmacokinetics, craving, and tolerability were assessed. Results: In Part B, the novel device 0.45 and 0.67 mg produced significantly lower Cmax, AUClast, and AUCall than Nicorette® (all p ≤ .05), higher AUC0-10 and significantly shorter Tmax (18.7 and 19.2 min vs. 38.0 min, respectively, p ≥ .05). Craving score AUC was lower for the novel device 0.45 mg than for Nicorette® in Part B (1356.3 vs. 1566.3, p = .029) and approached statistical significance in Part D (1208.5 vs. 1402.3 [p = .059]). Mean craving scores were lower for the novel device 0.45 mg than Nicorette® at 7/8 postdose timepoints in Part B (p ≤ .05 at 180 and 240 min) and at all timepoints in Part D (p ≤ .05 at 2, 4, and 10 min). Conclusions: The novel device was at least as effective as the Nicorette® Inhalator (10 mg) in relieving craving and smoking urges and was statistically superior at certain timepoints and in an overall craving AUC analysis, despite lower total nicotine exposure.
U2 - 10.1093/ntr/ntu122
DO - 10.1093/ntr/ntu122
M3 - Article
C2 - 25082830
SN - 1462-2203
VL - 17
SP - 26
EP - 33
JO - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
JF - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
IS - 1
ER -