Evaluating the interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meeting: A survey of expert centres

H.E. Jo, T.J. Corte, Yuben Moodley, K. Levin, G. Westall, P. Hopkins, D. Chambers, I. Glaspole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2016 Jo et al. Background: Multidisciplinary meetings (MDM) are the current "gold standard" in interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis and comprise inter-disciplinary discussion of multiple forms of information to provide diagnostic and management outputs. Although bias could be potentially inserted at any step in the discussion process, to date there has been no consensus regarding the appropriate constitution and governance of MDM. We sought to determine the features of ILD MDMs based within ILD centres of excellence around the world. Methods: An internet based questionnaire was sent to twelve expert centres in Europe, North America, and Australia seeking information regarding the structure and governance of their MDM. Data was analysed for consistent themes and points of contrast. Results: Responses were received from 10 out of 12 centres. Similarities were demonstrated with regards to contributing attendees, meeting frequency and case numbers reviewed. Significant heterogeneity in attendee speciality group type, quantity and method of data presentation, approach to diagnosis formulation and documentation, and information provision was apparent. Conclusions: The constitution of ILD MDMs differs considerably between expert centres. Such differences may result in discordant outcomes, and emphasise the need for further evidence regarding the appropriate constitution and governance of ILD MDMs.
Original languageEnglish
Article number22
JournalBMC Pulmonary Medicine
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Interstitial Lung Diseases
Constitution and Bylaws
North America
Documentation
Internet
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Jo, H.E. ; Corte, T.J. ; Moodley, Yuben ; Levin, K. ; Westall, G. ; Hopkins, P. ; Chambers, D. ; Glaspole, I. / Evaluating the interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meeting: A survey of expert centres. In: BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 1.
@article{b4d280f3d8c247b0814e1aa65c28b52b,
title = "Evaluating the interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meeting: A survey of expert centres",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2016 Jo et al. Background: Multidisciplinary meetings (MDM) are the current {"}gold standard{"} in interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis and comprise inter-disciplinary discussion of multiple forms of information to provide diagnostic and management outputs. Although bias could be potentially inserted at any step in the discussion process, to date there has been no consensus regarding the appropriate constitution and governance of MDM. We sought to determine the features of ILD MDMs based within ILD centres of excellence around the world. Methods: An internet based questionnaire was sent to twelve expert centres in Europe, North America, and Australia seeking information regarding the structure and governance of their MDM. Data was analysed for consistent themes and points of contrast. Results: Responses were received from 10 out of 12 centres. Similarities were demonstrated with regards to contributing attendees, meeting frequency and case numbers reviewed. Significant heterogeneity in attendee speciality group type, quantity and method of data presentation, approach to diagnosis formulation and documentation, and information provision was apparent. Conclusions: The constitution of ILD MDMs differs considerably between expert centres. Such differences may result in discordant outcomes, and emphasise the need for further evidence regarding the appropriate constitution and governance of ILD MDMs.",
author = "H.E. Jo and T.J. Corte and Yuben Moodley and K. Levin and G. Westall and P. Hopkins and D. Chambers and I. Glaspole",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1186/s12890-016-0179-3",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "B M C Pulmonary Medicine",
issn = "1471-2466",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

Evaluating the interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meeting: A survey of expert centres. / Jo, H.E.; Corte, T.J.; Moodley, Yuben; Levin, K.; Westall, G.; Hopkins, P.; Chambers, D.; Glaspole, I.

In: BMC Pulmonary Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 1, 22, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meeting: A survey of expert centres

AU - Jo, H.E.

AU - Corte, T.J.

AU - Moodley, Yuben

AU - Levin, K.

AU - Westall, G.

AU - Hopkins, P.

AU - Chambers, D.

AU - Glaspole, I.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - © 2016 Jo et al. Background: Multidisciplinary meetings (MDM) are the current "gold standard" in interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis and comprise inter-disciplinary discussion of multiple forms of information to provide diagnostic and management outputs. Although bias could be potentially inserted at any step in the discussion process, to date there has been no consensus regarding the appropriate constitution and governance of MDM. We sought to determine the features of ILD MDMs based within ILD centres of excellence around the world. Methods: An internet based questionnaire was sent to twelve expert centres in Europe, North America, and Australia seeking information regarding the structure and governance of their MDM. Data was analysed for consistent themes and points of contrast. Results: Responses were received from 10 out of 12 centres. Similarities were demonstrated with regards to contributing attendees, meeting frequency and case numbers reviewed. Significant heterogeneity in attendee speciality group type, quantity and method of data presentation, approach to diagnosis formulation and documentation, and information provision was apparent. Conclusions: The constitution of ILD MDMs differs considerably between expert centres. Such differences may result in discordant outcomes, and emphasise the need for further evidence regarding the appropriate constitution and governance of ILD MDMs.

AB - © 2016 Jo et al. Background: Multidisciplinary meetings (MDM) are the current "gold standard" in interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis and comprise inter-disciplinary discussion of multiple forms of information to provide diagnostic and management outputs. Although bias could be potentially inserted at any step in the discussion process, to date there has been no consensus regarding the appropriate constitution and governance of MDM. We sought to determine the features of ILD MDMs based within ILD centres of excellence around the world. Methods: An internet based questionnaire was sent to twelve expert centres in Europe, North America, and Australia seeking information regarding the structure and governance of their MDM. Data was analysed for consistent themes and points of contrast. Results: Responses were received from 10 out of 12 centres. Similarities were demonstrated with regards to contributing attendees, meeting frequency and case numbers reviewed. Significant heterogeneity in attendee speciality group type, quantity and method of data presentation, approach to diagnosis formulation and documentation, and information provision was apparent. Conclusions: The constitution of ILD MDMs differs considerably between expert centres. Such differences may result in discordant outcomes, and emphasise the need for further evidence regarding the appropriate constitution and governance of ILD MDMs.

U2 - 10.1186/s12890-016-0179-3

DO - 10.1186/s12890-016-0179-3

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - B M C Pulmonary Medicine

JF - B M C Pulmonary Medicine

SN - 1471-2466

IS - 1

M1 - 22

ER -