# Estimating turbulent dissipation from microstructure shear measurements using maximum likelihood spectral fitting over the inertial and viscous subranges

Cynthia Bluteau, Nicole Jones, Gregory Ivey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

### Abstract

© 2016 American Meteorological Society. A technique is presented to derive the dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy ε by using the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) to fit a theoretical or known empirical model to turbulence shear spectral observations. The commonly used integration method relies on integrating the shear spectra in the viscous range, thus requiring the resolution of the highest wavenumbers of the turbulence shear spectrum. With current technology, the viscous range is not resolved at sufficiently large wavenumbers to estimate high ε; however, long inertial subranges can be resolved, making spectral fitting over both this subrange and the resolved portion of the viscous range an attractive method for deriving ε. The MLE takes into account the chi-distributed properties of the spectral observations, and so it does not rely on the log-transformed spectral observations. This fitting technique can thus take advantage of both the inertial and viscous subranges, a portion of both, or simply one of the subranges. This flexibility allows a broad range of ε to be resolved. The estimated ε is insensitive to the range of wavenumbers fitted with the model, provided the noise-dominated portion of the spectra and the low wavenumbers impacted by the mean flow are avoided. For ε ≲ 10-6 W kg-1, the MLE fitting estimates agree with those obtained by integrating the spectral observations. However, with increasing ε the viscous subrange is not fully resolved and the integration method progressively starts to underestimate ε compared with the values obtained from fitting the spectral observations.
Original language English 713-722 Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 33 4 https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0218.1 Published - Apr 2016

### Fingerprint

Maximum likelihood
dissipation
microstructure
Microstructure
Turbulence
turbulence
Kinetic energy
kinetic energy
method

### Cite this

@article{0892d0dfbef844beac840fd3bfdd8e50,
title = "Estimating turbulent dissipation from microstructure shear measurements using maximum likelihood spectral fitting over the inertial and viscous subranges",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2016 American Meteorological Society. A technique is presented to derive the dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy ε by using the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) to fit a theoretical or known empirical model to turbulence shear spectral observations. The commonly used integration method relies on integrating the shear spectra in the viscous range, thus requiring the resolution of the highest wavenumbers of the turbulence shear spectrum. With current technology, the viscous range is not resolved at sufficiently large wavenumbers to estimate high ε; however, long inertial subranges can be resolved, making spectral fitting over both this subrange and the resolved portion of the viscous range an attractive method for deriving ε. The MLE takes into account the chi-distributed properties of the spectral observations, and so it does not rely on the log-transformed spectral observations. This fitting technique can thus take advantage of both the inertial and viscous subranges, a portion of both, or simply one of the subranges. This flexibility allows a broad range of ε to be resolved. The estimated ε is insensitive to the range of wavenumbers fitted with the model, provided the noise-dominated portion of the spectra and the low wavenumbers impacted by the mean flow are avoided. For ε ≲ 10-6 W kg-1, the MLE fitting estimates agree with those obtained by integrating the spectral observations. However, with increasing ε the viscous subrange is not fully resolved and the integration method progressively starts to underestimate ε compared with the values obtained from fitting the spectral observations.",
author = "Cynthia Bluteau and Nicole Jones and Gregory Ivey",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0218.1",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "713--722",
journal = "Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology",
issn = "0739-0572",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "4",

}

In: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 33, No. 4, 04.2016, p. 713-722.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating turbulent dissipation from microstructure shear measurements using maximum likelihood spectral fitting over the inertial and viscous subranges

AU - Bluteau, Cynthia

AU - Jones, Nicole

AU - Ivey, Gregory

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - © 2016 American Meteorological Society. A technique is presented to derive the dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy ε by using the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) to fit a theoretical or known empirical model to turbulence shear spectral observations. The commonly used integration method relies on integrating the shear spectra in the viscous range, thus requiring the resolution of the highest wavenumbers of the turbulence shear spectrum. With current technology, the viscous range is not resolved at sufficiently large wavenumbers to estimate high ε; however, long inertial subranges can be resolved, making spectral fitting over both this subrange and the resolved portion of the viscous range an attractive method for deriving ε. The MLE takes into account the chi-distributed properties of the spectral observations, and so it does not rely on the log-transformed spectral observations. This fitting technique can thus take advantage of both the inertial and viscous subranges, a portion of both, or simply one of the subranges. This flexibility allows a broad range of ε to be resolved. The estimated ε is insensitive to the range of wavenumbers fitted with the model, provided the noise-dominated portion of the spectra and the low wavenumbers impacted by the mean flow are avoided. For ε ≲ 10-6 W kg-1, the MLE fitting estimates agree with those obtained by integrating the spectral observations. However, with increasing ε the viscous subrange is not fully resolved and the integration method progressively starts to underestimate ε compared with the values obtained from fitting the spectral observations.

AB - © 2016 American Meteorological Society. A technique is presented to derive the dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy ε by using the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) to fit a theoretical or known empirical model to turbulence shear spectral observations. The commonly used integration method relies on integrating the shear spectra in the viscous range, thus requiring the resolution of the highest wavenumbers of the turbulence shear spectrum. With current technology, the viscous range is not resolved at sufficiently large wavenumbers to estimate high ε; however, long inertial subranges can be resolved, making spectral fitting over both this subrange and the resolved portion of the viscous range an attractive method for deriving ε. The MLE takes into account the chi-distributed properties of the spectral observations, and so it does not rely on the log-transformed spectral observations. This fitting technique can thus take advantage of both the inertial and viscous subranges, a portion of both, or simply one of the subranges. This flexibility allows a broad range of ε to be resolved. The estimated ε is insensitive to the range of wavenumbers fitted with the model, provided the noise-dominated portion of the spectra and the low wavenumbers impacted by the mean flow are avoided. For ε ≲ 10-6 W kg-1, the MLE fitting estimates agree with those obtained by integrating the spectral observations. However, with increasing ε the viscous subrange is not fully resolved and the integration method progressively starts to underestimate ε compared with the values obtained from fitting the spectral observations.

U2 - 10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0218.1

DO - 10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0218.1

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 713

EP - 722

JO - Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

JF - Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

SN - 0739-0572

IS - 4

ER -