Epistemic Diversity and Editor Decisions: A Statistical Matthew Effect

Remco Heesen, Jan-Willem Romeijn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Downloads (Pure)


This paper offers a new angle on the common idea that the process of science does not support epistemic diversity. Under minimal assumptions on the nature of journal editing, we prove that editorial procedures, even when impartial in themselves, disadvantage less prominent research programs. This purely statistical bias in article selection further skews existing differences in the success rate and hence attractiveness of research programs, and exacerbates the reputation difference between the programs. After a discussion of the modeling assumptions, the paper ends with a number of recommendations that may help promote scientific diversity through editorial decision making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalPhilosophers' Imprint
Issue number39
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemic Diversity and Editor Decisions: A Statistical Matthew Effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this