TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhanced but highly variable biodiversity outcomes from coastal restoration
T2 - A global synthesis
AU - Sievers, Michael
AU - Connolly, Rod M.
AU - Finlayson, Kimberly A.
AU - Kitchingman, Michaela E.
AU - Ostrowski, Andria
AU - Pearson, Ryan M.
AU - Turschwell, Mischa P.
AU - Adame, Maria F.
AU - Bugnot, Ana B.
AU - Ditria, Ellen
AU - Hale, Robin
AU - Silliman, Brian R.
AU - Swearer, Stephen E.
AU - Valdez, Stephanie R.
AU - Brown, Christopher J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/4/19
Y1 - 2024/4/19
N2 - Coastal ecosystems are being restored to combat environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Colonization of restored sites by non-habitat-forming animals improves outcomes for ecosystems and society, yet there has been no review of how animals respond to coastal restoration. Here, we extracted 5,133 response ratios from 160 studies to show how coastal ecosystem restoration benefits animals as individuals, populations, and communities. Abundances and diversity at restored sites were greater than at degraded (61% and 35%, respectively) and unstructured (42% and 37%) control sites and similar to those at natural reference sites (both within 2%). Individuals in restored sites were similar in condition to those within control and reference sites. However, responses among projects were highly variable and rarely related to restored site maturity or characteristics, presenting a challenge for predicting outcomes and highlighting the need to improve restoration techniques, monitoring, and reporting. Nevertheless, studies so far suggest coastal restoration benefits biodiversity.
AB - Coastal ecosystems are being restored to combat environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Colonization of restored sites by non-habitat-forming animals improves outcomes for ecosystems and society, yet there has been no review of how animals respond to coastal restoration. Here, we extracted 5,133 response ratios from 160 studies to show how coastal ecosystem restoration benefits animals as individuals, populations, and communities. Abundances and diversity at restored sites were greater than at degraded (61% and 35%, respectively) and unstructured (42% and 37%) control sites and similar to those at natural reference sites (both within 2%). Individuals in restored sites were similar in condition to those within control and reference sites. However, responses among projects were highly variable and rarely related to restored site maturity or characteristics, presenting a challenge for predicting outcomes and highlighting the need to improve restoration techniques, monitoring, and reporting. Nevertheless, studies so far suggest coastal restoration benefits biodiversity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190332846&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.02.013
DO - 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.02.013
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85190332846
SN - 2590-3330
VL - 7
SP - 623
EP - 634
JO - One Earth
JF - One Earth
IS - 4
ER -