Endotracheal tube mucus as a source of airway mucus for rheological study

Matthew R. Markovetz, Durai B. Subramani, William J. Kissner, Cameron B. Morrison, Ian C. Garbarine, Andrew Ghio, Kathryn A. Ramsey, Harendra Arora, Priya Kumar, David B. Nix, Tadahiro Kumagai, Thomas M. Krunkosky, Duncan C. Krause, Giorgia Radicioni, Neil E. Alexis, Mehmet Kesimer, Michael Tiemeyer, Richard C. Boucher, Camille Ehre, David B. Hill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    39 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Mucoobstructive lung diseases (MOLDs), like cystic fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, affect a spectrum of subjects globally. In MOLDs, the airway mucus becomes hyperconcentrated, increasing osmotic and viscoelastic moduli and impairing mucus clearance. MOLD research requires relevant sources of healthy airway mucus for experimental manipulation and analysis. Mucus collected from endotracheal tubes (ETT) may represent such a source with benefits, e.g., in vivo production, over canonical sample types such as sputum or human bronchial epithelial (HBE) mucus. Ionic and biochemical compositions of ETT mucus from healthy human subjects were characterized and a stock of pooled ETT samples generated. Pooled ETT mucus exhibited concentration-dependent rheologic properties that agreed across spatial scales with reported individual ETT samples and HBE mucus. We suggest that the practical benefits compared with other sample types make ETT mucus potentially useful for MOLD research.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)L498-L509
    Number of pages12
    JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
    Volume317
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Endotracheal tube mucus as a source of airway mucus for rheological study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this