TY - JOUR
T1 - Endometrial ablation
AU - Mcgurgan, Paul
AU - O'Donovan, P.
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - Conventional endometrial ablation has been extensively validated; however, many of the newer techniques have inadequate patient numbers or lengths of follow-up on which to evaluate their long-term efficacy, safety or cost effectiveness fully. The anticipated decline in hysterectomy rates with the advent of endometrial destruction methods has not occurred, and this may indicate a lower threshold for surgical management.
AB - Conventional endometrial ablation has been extensively validated; however, many of the newer techniques have inadequate patient numbers or lengths of follow-up on which to evaluate their long-term efficacy, safety or cost effectiveness fully. The anticipated decline in hysterectomy rates with the advent of endometrial destruction methods has not occurred, and this may indicate a lower threshold for surgical management.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0141629453
U2 - 10.1097/00001703-200308000-00006
DO - 10.1097/00001703-200308000-00006
M3 - Review article
SN - 1040-872X
VL - 15
SP - 327
EP - 332
JO - Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 4
ER -