TY - JOUR
T1 - Encouraging physical activity through dog walking: Why don't some owners walk with their dog?
AU - Giles-Corti, Billie
AU - Cutt, Hayley
AU - Knuiman, Matthew
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Objective: To identify factors associated with owners not walking with their dog. Method:Dog owners (n = 629) taking part in the RESIDE study, Perth, Western Australia completed a self-administered questionnaire in 2005–06 that included items about the dog, dog–owner relationship, dog walking and intrapersonal and environmental factors associated with dog walking. Physical activity data were also collected using NPAQ. Results:Overall, 23% of dog owners did not walk with their dog. More dog walkers achieved 150 min of physical activity/week than owners who did not walk with their dog (72% vs. 44%, p <0.001). Not walking with a dog was significantly more likely in owners who did not perceive that their dog provided motivation (OR 9.60, 95% CI: 4.37, 21.08) or social support (OR 10.84, 95% CI: 5.15, 22.80) to walk, independent of other well-known correlates of physical activity. Conclusion: There would be a significant impact on community physical activity levels if owners who do not walk with their dog could be persuaded to begin dog walking. Understanding the factors that discourage or facilitate owners to walk with their dog will assist in tailoring interventions designed to encourage both the uptake and maintenance of regular dog walking.
AB - Objective: To identify factors associated with owners not walking with their dog. Method:Dog owners (n = 629) taking part in the RESIDE study, Perth, Western Australia completed a self-administered questionnaire in 2005–06 that included items about the dog, dog–owner relationship, dog walking and intrapersonal and environmental factors associated with dog walking. Physical activity data were also collected using NPAQ. Results:Overall, 23% of dog owners did not walk with their dog. More dog walkers achieved 150 min of physical activity/week than owners who did not walk with their dog (72% vs. 44%, p <0.001). Not walking with a dog was significantly more likely in owners who did not perceive that their dog provided motivation (OR 9.60, 95% CI: 4.37, 21.08) or social support (OR 10.84, 95% CI: 5.15, 22.80) to walk, independent of other well-known correlates of physical activity. Conclusion: There would be a significant impact on community physical activity levels if owners who do not walk with their dog could be persuaded to begin dog walking. Understanding the factors that discourage or facilitate owners to walk with their dog will assist in tailoring interventions designed to encourage both the uptake and maintenance of regular dog walking.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.015
DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 17942146
SN - 0091-7435
VL - 46
SP - 120
EP - 126
JO - Preventive Medicine
JF - Preventive Medicine
IS - 2
ER -