Encountering an encultured Nature: Some edifying examples from Indigenous Southern Africa

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

Abstract

Human understandings of the concepts ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ are multiple and often confusing. One way to gain perspective on this issue is to attempt to step outside our own frames of reference. For example, Southern Africa’s First People known as the ‘Bushmen’ or ‘San’ have enjoyed international renown as the original ecologists, living ‘close to nature’. This ‘noble savage’ stereotype is, however, disempowering as it places Bushmen in a timeless de-politicised space; deflecting attention from their intellectual achievements and current socio-political struggles. This stereotype is predicated on a particular post-Enlightenment understanding of the concepts ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ as a quite rigid and given binary opposition. The theory of evolution has tended to intensify the divide between the two concepts. But there are also other, older ways of understanding the world and humanity’s place in it. Many indigenous people do not, for example, consider ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ to be opposed. In fact many Indigenous cultures do not see two concepts at all; preferring to consider both part of ‘culture’. This philosophy is most powerfully understood by considering notions of identity, which are very often at their strongest when in proximity to geographic loci that have a deep connection to the past and to inner and outer landscapes. Such a comparative project allows many previously insoluble contradictions to dissolve and provide new syntheses to old problems. Both Indigenous and post-Industrialised cultures inhabit similar parts of the environment and an integrated and flexible manner of approaching the management of these environments is no longer negotiable. But not all such solutions are the same and it is important to maintain a strong local flavour by using embedded cultural resources such as rock art and Origin Sites. In this way ‘we’ and ‘they’ can more easily communicate, plan and mobilise enduring ways not only of managing the human heritage in an appropriately nuanced manner, but also of adding to it.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNature and Culture: ambivalent dimensions of our heritage
Subtitle of host publicationUNESCO-sponsored programmes and publications
EditorsSieglinde Geier-Lietz
Place of PublicationCottbus
PublisherDrukzone
Pages199-217
Number of pages19
ISBN (Print)3-927907-84-7
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Southern Africa
stereotype
opposition
art
management
resources

Cite this

Ouzman, S. (2002). Encountering an encultured Nature: Some edifying examples from Indigenous Southern Africa. In S. Geier-Lietz (Ed.), Nature and Culture: ambivalent dimensions of our heritage: UNESCO-sponsored programmes and publications (pp. 199-217). Cottbus: Drukzone.
Ouzman, Sven. / Encountering an encultured Nature: Some edifying examples from Indigenous Southern Africa. Nature and Culture: ambivalent dimensions of our heritage: UNESCO-sponsored programmes and publications. editor / Sieglinde Geier-Lietz. Cottbus : Drukzone, 2002. pp. 199-217
@inbook{b2c1eef3ae4748629b1adbaaa866d904,
title = "Encountering an encultured Nature: Some edifying examples from Indigenous Southern Africa",
abstract = "Human understandings of the concepts ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ are multiple and often confusing. One way to gain perspective on this issue is to attempt to step outside our own frames of reference. For example, Southern Africa’s First People known as the ‘Bushmen’ or ‘San’ have enjoyed international renown as the original ecologists, living ‘close to nature’. This ‘noble savage’ stereotype is, however, disempowering as it places Bushmen in a timeless de-politicised space; deflecting attention from their intellectual achievements and current socio-political struggles. This stereotype is predicated on a particular post-Enlightenment understanding of the concepts ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ as a quite rigid and given binary opposition. The theory of evolution has tended to intensify the divide between the two concepts. But there are also other, older ways of understanding the world and humanity’s place in it. Many indigenous people do not, for example, consider ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ to be opposed. In fact many Indigenous cultures do not see two concepts at all; preferring to consider both part of ‘culture’. This philosophy is most powerfully understood by considering notions of identity, which are very often at their strongest when in proximity to geographic loci that have a deep connection to the past and to inner and outer landscapes. Such a comparative project allows many previously insoluble contradictions to dissolve and provide new syntheses to old problems. Both Indigenous and post-Industrialised cultures inhabit similar parts of the environment and an integrated and flexible manner of approaching the management of these environments is no longer negotiable. But not all such solutions are the same and it is important to maintain a strong local flavour by using embedded cultural resources such as rock art and Origin Sites. In this way ‘we’ and ‘they’ can more easily communicate, plan and mobilise enduring ways not only of managing the human heritage in an appropriately nuanced manner, but also of adding to it.",
keywords = "Archaeology, Heritage, UNESCO, Southern Africa",
author = "Sven Ouzman",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
isbn = "3-927907-84-7",
pages = "199--217",
editor = "Sieglinde Geier-Lietz",
booktitle = "Nature and Culture: ambivalent dimensions of our heritage",
publisher = "Drukzone",

}

Ouzman, S 2002, Encountering an encultured Nature: Some edifying examples from Indigenous Southern Africa. in S Geier-Lietz (ed.), Nature and Culture: ambivalent dimensions of our heritage: UNESCO-sponsored programmes and publications. Drukzone, Cottbus, pp. 199-217.

Encountering an encultured Nature: Some edifying examples from Indigenous Southern Africa. / Ouzman, Sven.

Nature and Culture: ambivalent dimensions of our heritage: UNESCO-sponsored programmes and publications. ed. / Sieglinde Geier-Lietz. Cottbus : Drukzone, 2002. p. 199-217.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Encountering an encultured Nature: Some edifying examples from Indigenous Southern Africa

AU - Ouzman, Sven

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Human understandings of the concepts ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ are multiple and often confusing. One way to gain perspective on this issue is to attempt to step outside our own frames of reference. For example, Southern Africa’s First People known as the ‘Bushmen’ or ‘San’ have enjoyed international renown as the original ecologists, living ‘close to nature’. This ‘noble savage’ stereotype is, however, disempowering as it places Bushmen in a timeless de-politicised space; deflecting attention from their intellectual achievements and current socio-political struggles. This stereotype is predicated on a particular post-Enlightenment understanding of the concepts ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ as a quite rigid and given binary opposition. The theory of evolution has tended to intensify the divide between the two concepts. But there are also other, older ways of understanding the world and humanity’s place in it. Many indigenous people do not, for example, consider ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ to be opposed. In fact many Indigenous cultures do not see two concepts at all; preferring to consider both part of ‘culture’. This philosophy is most powerfully understood by considering notions of identity, which are very often at their strongest when in proximity to geographic loci that have a deep connection to the past and to inner and outer landscapes. Such a comparative project allows many previously insoluble contradictions to dissolve and provide new syntheses to old problems. Both Indigenous and post-Industrialised cultures inhabit similar parts of the environment and an integrated and flexible manner of approaching the management of these environments is no longer negotiable. But not all such solutions are the same and it is important to maintain a strong local flavour by using embedded cultural resources such as rock art and Origin Sites. In this way ‘we’ and ‘they’ can more easily communicate, plan and mobilise enduring ways not only of managing the human heritage in an appropriately nuanced manner, but also of adding to it.

AB - Human understandings of the concepts ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ are multiple and often confusing. One way to gain perspective on this issue is to attempt to step outside our own frames of reference. For example, Southern Africa’s First People known as the ‘Bushmen’ or ‘San’ have enjoyed international renown as the original ecologists, living ‘close to nature’. This ‘noble savage’ stereotype is, however, disempowering as it places Bushmen in a timeless de-politicised space; deflecting attention from their intellectual achievements and current socio-political struggles. This stereotype is predicated on a particular post-Enlightenment understanding of the concepts ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ as a quite rigid and given binary opposition. The theory of evolution has tended to intensify the divide between the two concepts. But there are also other, older ways of understanding the world and humanity’s place in it. Many indigenous people do not, for example, consider ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ to be opposed. In fact many Indigenous cultures do not see two concepts at all; preferring to consider both part of ‘culture’. This philosophy is most powerfully understood by considering notions of identity, which are very often at their strongest when in proximity to geographic loci that have a deep connection to the past and to inner and outer landscapes. Such a comparative project allows many previously insoluble contradictions to dissolve and provide new syntheses to old problems. Both Indigenous and post-Industrialised cultures inhabit similar parts of the environment and an integrated and flexible manner of approaching the management of these environments is no longer negotiable. But not all such solutions are the same and it is important to maintain a strong local flavour by using embedded cultural resources such as rock art and Origin Sites. In this way ‘we’ and ‘they’ can more easily communicate, plan and mobilise enduring ways not only of managing the human heritage in an appropriately nuanced manner, but also of adding to it.

KW - Archaeology

KW - Heritage

KW - UNESCO

KW - Southern Africa

UR - http://unesdoc.unesco.org/Ulis/cgi-bin/ulis.pl?catno=135642&set=53B3F916_2_92&gp=&lin=1&ll=c

M3 - Chapter

SN - 3-927907-84-7

SP - 199

EP - 217

BT - Nature and Culture: ambivalent dimensions of our heritage

A2 - Geier-Lietz, Sieglinde

PB - Drukzone

CY - Cottbus

ER -

Ouzman S. Encountering an encultured Nature: Some edifying examples from Indigenous Southern Africa. In Geier-Lietz S, editor, Nature and Culture: ambivalent dimensions of our heritage: UNESCO-sponsored programmes and publications. Cottbus: Drukzone. 2002. p. 199-217