TY - JOUR
T1 - Employment discrimination against gender diverse individuals in Western Australia
AU - Bates, Trudy
AU - Thomas, Cati S.
AU - Timming, Andrew R.
PY - 2020/10/27
Y1 - 2020/10/27
N2 - Purpose: This paper explores employment discrimination against gender diverse job applicants and employees in Western Australia (WA). Design/methodology/approach: Using grounded theory, this study draws on semi-structured interviews with respondents (n = 20) who identified as trans women, trans men, nonbinary or agender. Thematic analysis focused on the multiple dimensions of disadvantage experienced by respondents, including subtle, not so subtle and overt types of employment discrimination. Findings: The authors’ results point to several reasons why gender diverse individuals (GDIs) may fear the labor market, including difficulties in concealing their stigma and acquiescence to discrimination. On the other hand, our results also point to sources of organizational support, including encouragement from direct line managers and colleagues who are also Allies. Practical implications: The results of the research have important implications for sociological frameworks surrounding dramaturgy, stigma, aesthetic labor, organizational silence and social identity. Practical implications for employers, employees, human resource (HR) professionals and trade unions are also articulated. Originality/value: Whereas previous studies have prioritized the discriminatory experiences of GDIs in the US and European labor markets, this study reports on gender diverse voices in WA. Furthermore, recent work on this topic has been experimental and largely quantitative, whereas the present study offers a compelling set of profound narratives, thereby addressing calls for qualitative research that foregrounds the complexities and nuances of lived experience for GDIs and renders their voices heard.
AB - Purpose: This paper explores employment discrimination against gender diverse job applicants and employees in Western Australia (WA). Design/methodology/approach: Using grounded theory, this study draws on semi-structured interviews with respondents (n = 20) who identified as trans women, trans men, nonbinary or agender. Thematic analysis focused on the multiple dimensions of disadvantage experienced by respondents, including subtle, not so subtle and overt types of employment discrimination. Findings: The authors’ results point to several reasons why gender diverse individuals (GDIs) may fear the labor market, including difficulties in concealing their stigma and acquiescence to discrimination. On the other hand, our results also point to sources of organizational support, including encouragement from direct line managers and colleagues who are also Allies. Practical implications: The results of the research have important implications for sociological frameworks surrounding dramaturgy, stigma, aesthetic labor, organizational silence and social identity. Practical implications for employers, employees, human resource (HR) professionals and trade unions are also articulated. Originality/value: Whereas previous studies have prioritized the discriminatory experiences of GDIs in the US and European labor markets, this study reports on gender diverse voices in WA. Furthermore, recent work on this topic has been experimental and largely quantitative, whereas the present study offers a compelling set of profound narratives, thereby addressing calls for qualitative research that foregrounds the complexities and nuances of lived experience for GDIs and renders their voices heard.
KW - Aesthetic labor
KW - Agender
KW - Discrimination
KW - Dramaturgy
KW - Employment
KW - Gender
KW - Non-binary
KW - Organizational silence
KW - Social identity theory
KW - Stigma
KW - Trans
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093652744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/EDI-04-2020-0073
DO - 10.1108/EDI-04-2020-0073
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85093652744
JO - Equal Opportunities International
JF - Equal Opportunities International
SN - 0261-0159
ER -