Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change

Susie Wang, Zoe Leviston, Mark John Hurlstone, Carmen Mary Lawrence, Iain Alexander Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

Current research shows that emotions can motivate climate engagement and action, but precisely how has received scant attention. We propose that strong emotional responses to climate change result from perceiving one's “objects of care” as threatened by climate change, which motivates caring about climate change itself, and in turn predicts behaviour. In two studies, we find that climate scientists (N = 44) experience greater emotional intensity about climate change than do students (N = 94) and the general population (N = 205), and that patterns of emotional responses explain differences in support for climate change policy. Scientists tied their emotional responses to concern about consequences of climate change to future generations and the planet, as well as personal identities associated with responsibility to act. Our findings suggest that “objects of care” that link people to climate change may be crucial to understanding why some people feel more strongly about the issue than others, and how emotions can prompt action.
LanguageEnglish
Pages25-40
Number of pages15
JournalGLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
Volume50
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

Fingerprint

emotion
climate change
climate
policy
planet
student
responsibility
experience

Cite this

@article{9adb704023c845e6b3f7ad76f0949831,
title = "Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change",
abstract = "Current research shows that emotions can motivate climate engagement and action, but precisely how has received scant attention. We propose that strong emotional responses to climate change result from perceiving one's “objects of care” as threatened by climate change, which motivates caring about climate change itself, and in turn predicts behaviour. In two studies, we find that climate scientists (N = 44) experience greater emotional intensity about climate change than do students (N = 94) and the general population (N = 205), and that patterns of emotional responses explain differences in support for climate change policy. Scientists tied their emotional responses to concern about consequences of climate change to future generations and the planet, as well as personal identities associated with responsibility to act. Our findings suggest that “objects of care” that link people to climate change may be crucial to understanding why some people feel more strongly about the issue than others, and how emotions can prompt action.",
author = "Susie Wang and Zoe Leviston and Hurlstone, {Mark John} and Lawrence, {Carmen Mary} and Walker, {Iain Alexander}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.002",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "25--40",
journal = "GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS",
issn = "0959-3780",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change. / Wang, Susie; Leviston, Zoe; Hurlstone, Mark John; Lawrence, Carmen Mary; Walker, Iain Alexander.

In: GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, Vol. 50, 05.2018, p. 25-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change

AU - Wang, Susie

AU - Leviston, Zoe

AU - Hurlstone, Mark John

AU - Lawrence, Carmen Mary

AU - Walker, Iain Alexander

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - Current research shows that emotions can motivate climate engagement and action, but precisely how has received scant attention. We propose that strong emotional responses to climate change result from perceiving one's “objects of care” as threatened by climate change, which motivates caring about climate change itself, and in turn predicts behaviour. In two studies, we find that climate scientists (N = 44) experience greater emotional intensity about climate change than do students (N = 94) and the general population (N = 205), and that patterns of emotional responses explain differences in support for climate change policy. Scientists tied their emotional responses to concern about consequences of climate change to future generations and the planet, as well as personal identities associated with responsibility to act. Our findings suggest that “objects of care” that link people to climate change may be crucial to understanding why some people feel more strongly about the issue than others, and how emotions can prompt action.

AB - Current research shows that emotions can motivate climate engagement and action, but precisely how has received scant attention. We propose that strong emotional responses to climate change result from perceiving one's “objects of care” as threatened by climate change, which motivates caring about climate change itself, and in turn predicts behaviour. In two studies, we find that climate scientists (N = 44) experience greater emotional intensity about climate change than do students (N = 94) and the general population (N = 205), and that patterns of emotional responses explain differences in support for climate change policy. Scientists tied their emotional responses to concern about consequences of climate change to future generations and the planet, as well as personal identities associated with responsibility to act. Our findings suggest that “objects of care” that link people to climate change may be crucial to understanding why some people feel more strongly about the issue than others, and how emotions can prompt action.

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.002

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 25

EP - 40

JO - GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS

T2 - GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS

JF - GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS

SN - 0959-3780

ER -