Emergency Cesarean Delivery for Nonreassuring Fetal Heart Rate Tracings. Compliance with ACOG Guidelines

S.P. Chauhan, Pat Magann, J.R. Scott, J.A. Scardo, N.W. Hendrix, J.N. Martin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    45 Citations (Scopus)


    OBJECTIVE: To review the English-language literature from 1990 to 2000 on cesarean delivery for 'fetal distress" and assess compliance with American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines.STUDY DESIGN: A PubMed search with the search items cesarean, fetal distress, cesarean, nonreassuring fetal heart rate, cesarean, neonatal acidosis and cesarean, umbilical arterial pH was undertaken. Excluded from the search were case reports, letters to the editor, focus on fetal anomaly, combinations with other reasons for operative delivery (either abdominally or vaginally) or absence of pertinent information.RESULTS: Among 392 articles from the search, 169 met the inclusion criteria. Three reports provided detailed information on use of scalp pH; use occurred in 5% (60/1,128) of emergency cesareans. Three reports provided data on the use of tocolytics for intrauterine resuscitation; the combined result was 16% (201/1,261). Five reports assessed the decision-to-incision interval within 30 minutes; in 59% (262/446) of cases it was achieved. Five reports contained cord pH information on 340 emergency cesarean deliveries; umbilical arterial pH was < 7.00 in 10%.CONCLUSION: Physician use of, and compliance with, ACOG guidelines for emergency cesarean deliveries is difficult to assess, and incomplete compliance appears commonplace.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)975-981
    JournalJournal of Reproductive Medicine
    Issue number12
    Publication statusPublished - 2003


    Dive into the research topics of 'Emergency Cesarean Delivery for Nonreassuring Fetal Heart Rate Tracings. Compliance with ACOG Guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this