Abstract
Marshall's (1999) article used Wittgenstein to argue that self functions as an explanation for a name rather than a referent. This brief response tries to rescue Marshall from an apparent reduction of self to material body without returning him to the mind/body dualism that he, with Wittgenstein and Dennett, seeks to avoid. It treats ‘I’ as an emergent institutional fact, not inconsistent with a constructed explanation or narrative, but emerging from shared social practices rather than an abstracted agent.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 343-347 |
Journal | Educational Philosophy and Theory |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |