Efficacy of alternative medicaments for pulp treatment in primary teeth in the short-term: meta-analysis

Joon Soo Park, Bosky Jasani, Jilen Patel, Robert Anthonappa, Nigel King

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
81 Downloads (Pure)



This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the overall, clinical, and radiographical success rates of alternative pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth.

A systematic search of five databases was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Prospective clinical trials using alternative pulpotomy medicaments in children were included. The outcome measures were overall, clinical, and radiographic success, expressed in percentages and converted to odds ratios. Fifteen articles were included in the meta-analysis.

Combined odds ratios for overall, clinical, and radiographic success was 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-2.41; P = .42; I2 = 76%), 1.03 (95% CI: 0.57-1.86; P = .92; I2 = 0%), and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.54-1.47; P = .66; I2 = 34%), respectively. The results suggest an inconclusive outcome in the success rate of alternative medicaments.

There is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of alternative pulpotomy medicaments for use in primary teeth. Further robust studies are required before such alternative medicaments should be used in clinical practice.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101309
JournalJournal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of alternative medicaments for pulp treatment in primary teeth in the short-term: meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this