Abstract
© 2014, National Research Council of Canada. All Rights Reserved. This paper presents the results from a series of three-dimensional finite element analyses, which examine the benefits of adopting square pile-tower structures instead of circular monopiles. The advantages of square monopiles are brought out in this paper through a parametric study with a Tresca soil model, where the shear strength and modulus of elasticity varied with depth and the pile-tower structures were modelled as an elastoplastic material. The effects of pile diameter, pile thickness, eccentricity, and pile length for free-head pile-towers embedded in lightly overconsolidated and heavily overconsolidated clays were investigated. From the results of the numerical models, it is clear that the ultimate lateral capacity and stiffness of square pile-tower structures are substantially higher than of circular structures embedded in clay layers. Moreover, the amount of rotation and displacement of square structures are not significantly affected compared to circular monopiles.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1144-1158 |
Journal | Canadian Geotechnical Journal |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |