Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44

C. Dominique Losco, William D. Grant, Anthony Armson, Amanda J. Meyer, Bruce F. Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Anatomy is a subject essential to medical practice, yet time committed to teaching is on the decline, and resources required to teach anatomy is costly, particularly dissection. Advances in technology are a potential solution to the problem, while maintaining the quality of teaching required for eventual clinical application. Aim: To identify methods used to teach anatomy, including those demonstrated to enhance knowledge acquisition and retention. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Academic OneFile, ProQuest, SAGE journals and Scopus were search from the earliest entry of each database to 31 August 2015. All included articles were assessed for methodological quality and low quality articles were excluded from the study. Studies were evaluated by assessment scores, qualitative outcomes where included as well as a modified Kirkpatrick model. Results: A total of 17,820 articles were initially identified, with 29 included in the review. The review found a wide variety of teaching interventions represented in the range of studies, with CAI/CAL studies predominating in terms of teaching interventions, followed by simulation. In addition to this, CAI/CAL and simulation studies demonstrated better results overall compared to traditional teaching methods and there is evidence to support CAI/CAL as a partial replacement for dissection or a valuable tool in conjunction with dissection. Conclusions: This review provides evidence in support of the use of alternatives to traditional teaching methods in anatomy, in particular, the use of CAI/CAL with a number of high quality, low risk of bias studies supporting this.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-243
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

method of teaching
Teaching
science
teaching method
learning
simulation
knowledge acquisition
medical practice
evidence
trend
resources

Cite this

Losco, C. Dominique ; Grant, William D. ; Armson, Anthony ; Meyer, Amanda J. ; Walker, Bruce F. / Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science : A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44. In: Medical Teacher. 2017 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 234-243.
@article{14e3bb6ebfdb49a595aafded73a15f26,
title = "Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44",
abstract = "Background: Anatomy is a subject essential to medical practice, yet time committed to teaching is on the decline, and resources required to teach anatomy is costly, particularly dissection. Advances in technology are a potential solution to the problem, while maintaining the quality of teaching required for eventual clinical application. Aim: To identify methods used to teach anatomy, including those demonstrated to enhance knowledge acquisition and retention. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Academic OneFile, ProQuest, SAGE journals and Scopus were search from the earliest entry of each database to 31 August 2015. All included articles were assessed for methodological quality and low quality articles were excluded from the study. Studies were evaluated by assessment scores, qualitative outcomes where included as well as a modified Kirkpatrick model. Results: A total of 17,820 articles were initially identified, with 29 included in the review. The review found a wide variety of teaching interventions represented in the range of studies, with CAI/CAL studies predominating in terms of teaching interventions, followed by simulation. In addition to this, CAI/CAL and simulation studies demonstrated better results overall compared to traditional teaching methods and there is evidence to support CAI/CAL as a partial replacement for dissection or a valuable tool in conjunction with dissection. Conclusions: This review provides evidence in support of the use of alternatives to traditional teaching methods in anatomy, in particular, the use of CAI/CAL with a number of high quality, low risk of bias studies supporting this.",
author = "Losco, {C. Dominique} and Grant, {William D.} and Anthony Armson and Meyer, {Amanda J.} and Walker, {Bruce F.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/0142159X.2016.1271944",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "234--243",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare USA",
number = "3",

}

Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science : A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44. / Losco, C. Dominique; Grant, William D.; Armson, Anthony; Meyer, Amanda J.; Walker, Bruce F.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 39, No. 3, 04.03.2017, p. 234-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science

T2 - A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44

AU - Losco, C. Dominique

AU - Grant, William D.

AU - Armson, Anthony

AU - Meyer, Amanda J.

AU - Walker, Bruce F.

PY - 2017/3/4

Y1 - 2017/3/4

N2 - Background: Anatomy is a subject essential to medical practice, yet time committed to teaching is on the decline, and resources required to teach anatomy is costly, particularly dissection. Advances in technology are a potential solution to the problem, while maintaining the quality of teaching required for eventual clinical application. Aim: To identify methods used to teach anatomy, including those demonstrated to enhance knowledge acquisition and retention. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Academic OneFile, ProQuest, SAGE journals and Scopus were search from the earliest entry of each database to 31 August 2015. All included articles were assessed for methodological quality and low quality articles were excluded from the study. Studies were evaluated by assessment scores, qualitative outcomes where included as well as a modified Kirkpatrick model. Results: A total of 17,820 articles were initially identified, with 29 included in the review. The review found a wide variety of teaching interventions represented in the range of studies, with CAI/CAL studies predominating in terms of teaching interventions, followed by simulation. In addition to this, CAI/CAL and simulation studies demonstrated better results overall compared to traditional teaching methods and there is evidence to support CAI/CAL as a partial replacement for dissection or a valuable tool in conjunction with dissection. Conclusions: This review provides evidence in support of the use of alternatives to traditional teaching methods in anatomy, in particular, the use of CAI/CAL with a number of high quality, low risk of bias studies supporting this.

AB - Background: Anatomy is a subject essential to medical practice, yet time committed to teaching is on the decline, and resources required to teach anatomy is costly, particularly dissection. Advances in technology are a potential solution to the problem, while maintaining the quality of teaching required for eventual clinical application. Aim: To identify methods used to teach anatomy, including those demonstrated to enhance knowledge acquisition and retention. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Academic OneFile, ProQuest, SAGE journals and Scopus were search from the earliest entry of each database to 31 August 2015. All included articles were assessed for methodological quality and low quality articles were excluded from the study. Studies were evaluated by assessment scores, qualitative outcomes where included as well as a modified Kirkpatrick model. Results: A total of 17,820 articles were initially identified, with 29 included in the review. The review found a wide variety of teaching interventions represented in the range of studies, with CAI/CAL studies predominating in terms of teaching interventions, followed by simulation. In addition to this, CAI/CAL and simulation studies demonstrated better results overall compared to traditional teaching methods and there is evidence to support CAI/CAL as a partial replacement for dissection or a valuable tool in conjunction with dissection. Conclusions: This review provides evidence in support of the use of alternatives to traditional teaching methods in anatomy, in particular, the use of CAI/CAL with a number of high quality, low risk of bias studies supporting this.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010993712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1271944

DO - 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1271944

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 234

EP - 243

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 3

ER -