Effect of narrow row-spacing and weed crop competition duration on cotton productivity

Nadeem Iqbal, Sudheesh Manalil, Bhagirath S. Chauhan, Steve W. Adkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


Amongst all biotic factors, weeds pose the most serious threat to successful cotton production. Adoption of conservation agriculture, the evolution of herbicide-resistant weed populations, and the absence of any new herbicide chemistry are allowing weeds to become more destructive and uncontrollable. It is important now to investigate cultural practices (non-chemical) to reduce the pressure on herbicides. Trials were conducted at the Gatton Research Farm of University of Queensland during 2015/16 and 2016/17 to assess the implications of narrow row-spacing (50 cm) in managing weeds in glyphosate-tolerant cotton at different weed-infestation intervals [0, 21, 42, 63, 84 and 154 days after planting (DAP)]. Results revealed that narrow (50 cm) row-spacing (at the same density of planting) was not only beneficial in suppressing weed growth (55% lower) and achieving greater lint yield (26% more) but also made the cotton plants more competitive in the early weed-crop interference compared with wide (100 cm) row-spacing. Consequently, the weed-crop competition period (CWIP) was shorter (42 days after emergence) in narrow row-spaced cotton when compared with wide row-spaced cotton (154 days after emergence). The use of this technology will reduce the reliance on herbicides, which in turn will decrease the development of future herbicide-resistant weed populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-367
Number of pages13
JournalArchives of Agronomy and Soil Science
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2022


Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of narrow row-spacing and weed crop competition duration on cotton productivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this