TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of dentine site on resin and cement adaptation tested using X-ray and electron microscopy to evaluate bond durability and adhesive interfaces
AU - Weerakoon, Arosha Tania
AU - Cooper, Crystal
AU - Sokolowski, Kamil Andrzej
AU - Meyers, Ian Arthur
AU - Thomson, David
AU - Ford, Pauline Jane
AU - Sexton, Christopher
AU - Symons, Anne Louise
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Glass ionomer (GI) cements and self-etch (SE) or universal adhesives after etching (ER) adapt variably with dentine. Dentine characteristics vary with depth (deep/shallow), location (central/peripheral), and microscopic site (intertubular/peritubular). To directly compare adhesion to dentine, non-destructive imaging and testing are required. Here, GI, ER, and SE adapted at different dentine depths, locations, and sites were investigated using micro-CT, xenon plasma focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (Xe PFIB-SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Extracted molars were prepared to deep or shallow slices and treated with the three adhesives. Micro-CT was used to compare changes to air volume gaps, following thermocycling, and statistically analysed using a quantile regression model and Fisher's exact test. The three adhesives performed similarly across dentine depths and locations, yet no change or overall increases and decreases in gaps at all dentine depths and locations were measured. The Xe PFIB-SEM-milled dentine-adhesive interfaces facilitated high-resolution characterization, and element profiling revealed variations across the tooth-material interfaces. Dentine depth and location had no impact on adhesive durability, although microscopic differences were observed. Here we demonstrate how micro-CT and Xe PFIB-SEM can be used to compare variable dental materials without complex multi-stage specimen preparation to minimize artefacts.
AB - Glass ionomer (GI) cements and self-etch (SE) or universal adhesives after etching (ER) adapt variably with dentine. Dentine characteristics vary with depth (deep/shallow), location (central/peripheral), and microscopic site (intertubular/peritubular). To directly compare adhesion to dentine, non-destructive imaging and testing are required. Here, GI, ER, and SE adapted at different dentine depths, locations, and sites were investigated using micro-CT, xenon plasma focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (Xe PFIB-SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Extracted molars were prepared to deep or shallow slices and treated with the three adhesives. Micro-CT was used to compare changes to air volume gaps, following thermocycling, and statistically analysed using a quantile regression model and Fisher's exact test. The three adhesives performed similarly across dentine depths and locations, yet no change or overall increases and decreases in gaps at all dentine depths and locations were measured. The Xe PFIB-SEM-milled dentine-adhesive interfaces facilitated high-resolution characterization, and element profiling revealed variations across the tooth-material interfaces. Dentine depth and location had no impact on adhesive durability, although microscopic differences were observed. Here we demonstrate how micro-CT and Xe PFIB-SEM can be used to compare variable dental materials without complex multi-stage specimen preparation to minimize artefacts.
KW - focused ion beam
KW - humans
KW - in vitro techniques
KW - materials testing
KW - surface properties
KW - ULTRASTRUCTURAL EXAMINATION
KW - HYBRID LAYER
KW - ONE-STEP
KW - DEGRADATION
KW - STRATEGIES
KW - TOMOGRAPHY
KW - STRENGTH
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135878695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85135878695
U2 - 10.1111/eos.12890
DO - 10.1111/eos.12890
M3 - Article
C2 - 35959863
SN - 0909-8836
VL - 130
JO - European Journal of Oral Sciences
JF - European Journal of Oral Sciences
IS - 5
M1 - e12890
ER -