Early diagnosis of Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy using MRI and its effect on patient outcomes: A seven-year retrospective audit

Deb Schoen, Laksh Lukkhoo, Sharlene Vu, Joanna Scheepers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: There remains a paucity of research comparing the diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes between Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and x-ray modalities for Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy CNO. This retrospective study investigates the use of offloading devices, duration of offloading and final footwear outcomes dependent on imaging at diagnosis. Methods: Medical records from a secondary hospital high-risk foot clinic in Perth, Western Australia, were systematically reviewed. Data collected included baseline medical history, location of CNO, Eichenholtz stage or Chantelau and Grutznel grade at diagnosis, type and duration of offloading, and final footwear outcomes. Results: Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. All had diabetes and peripheral neuropathy. All patients received either an MRI (43%) or x-ray (57%) to confirm the diagnosis of active CNO. Five (17.9%) patients who were diagnosed on MRI had grade 0 CNO whilst 23 (82.1%) patients who were diagnosed on x-ray had stage 1 CNO. No statistical significance was found between the type and duration of offloading, resolution of CNO, footwear and transtibial amputation (TTA) outcomes across those diagnosed with MRI or x-ray. Conclusion: No statistical significance in patient outcomes was found between those diagnosed with grade 0 on MRI and those diagnosed with stage 1 on x-ray.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100208
JournalDiabetes Epidemiology and Management
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early diagnosis of Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy using MRI and its effect on patient outcomes: A seven-year retrospective audit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this