Drawing Firmer Conclusions: Autistic Children Show No Evidence of a Local Processing Bias in a Controlled Copying Task

A.D. Smith, L. Kenny, A. Rudnicka, J. Briscoe, Elizabeth Pellicano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2016, The Author(s).Drawing tasks are frequently used to test competing theories of visuospatial skills in autism. Yet, methodological differences between studies have led to inconsistent findings. To distinguish between accounts based on local bias or global deficit, we present a simple task that has previously revealed dissociable local/global impairments in neuropsychological patients. Autistic and typical children copied corner elements, arranged in a square configuration. Grouping cues were manipulated to test whether global properties affected the accuracy of reproduction. All children were similarly affected by these manipulations. There was no group difference in the reproduction of local elements, although global accuracy was negatively related to better local processing for autistic children. These data speak against influential theories of visuospatial differences in autism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3481-3492
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Volume46
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Drawing Firmer Conclusions: Autistic Children Show No Evidence of a Local Processing Bias in a Controlled Copying Task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this