Double-ridge mounds improve tree establishment in saline seeps

P. Ritson, N. E. Pettit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effectiveness of different mound types and mound heights for the establishment of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. largiflorens in the southwest of Western Australia was compared over two years. Double-ridge mounds (seedlings planted in a 0.5-0.9-m-wide trough between the ridges) gave the best survival (50%, averaged for both species, all mound heights and all study sites). In contrast, survival in standard mounds (0.1-m-wide trough) and single ridge mounds (no trough) was only 11% in each case. Survival tended to increase with increasing mound height. In the double-ridge mounds, the improvement was from 35% in 0.25-m-high mounds to 49-59% in 0.5-, 0.75- and 1.0-m-high mounds. There were no significant effects of mound type or mound height on tree height or crown volume index two years after planting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-98
Number of pages10
JournalForest Ecology and Management
Volume48
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

trough
Eucalyptus largiflorens
Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Western Australia
tree crown
seedling
planting
seedlings
index
effect

Cite this

@article{032de2c8654f4989ad9c6231a62986d3,
title = "Double-ridge mounds improve tree establishment in saline seeps",
abstract = "The effectiveness of different mound types and mound heights for the establishment of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. largiflorens in the southwest of Western Australia was compared over two years. Double-ridge mounds (seedlings planted in a 0.5-0.9-m-wide trough between the ridges) gave the best survival (50{\%}, averaged for both species, all mound heights and all study sites). In contrast, survival in standard mounds (0.1-m-wide trough) and single ridge mounds (no trough) was only 11{\%} in each case. Survival tended to increase with increasing mound height. In the double-ridge mounds, the improvement was from 35{\%} in 0.25-m-high mounds to 49-59{\%} in 0.5-, 0.75- and 1.0-m-high mounds. There were no significant effects of mound type or mound height on tree height or crown volume index two years after planting.",
author = "P. Ritson and Pettit, {N. E.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0378-1127(92)90123-Q",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "89--98",
journal = "Forest Ecology and Management",
issn = "0378-1127",
publisher = "Pergamon",
number = "1-2",

}

Double-ridge mounds improve tree establishment in saline seeps. / Ritson, P.; Pettit, N. E.

In: Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 48, No. 1-2, 01.01.1992, p. 89-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Double-ridge mounds improve tree establishment in saline seeps

AU - Ritson, P.

AU - Pettit, N. E.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - The effectiveness of different mound types and mound heights for the establishment of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. largiflorens in the southwest of Western Australia was compared over two years. Double-ridge mounds (seedlings planted in a 0.5-0.9-m-wide trough between the ridges) gave the best survival (50%, averaged for both species, all mound heights and all study sites). In contrast, survival in standard mounds (0.1-m-wide trough) and single ridge mounds (no trough) was only 11% in each case. Survival tended to increase with increasing mound height. In the double-ridge mounds, the improvement was from 35% in 0.25-m-high mounds to 49-59% in 0.5-, 0.75- and 1.0-m-high mounds. There were no significant effects of mound type or mound height on tree height or crown volume index two years after planting.

AB - The effectiveness of different mound types and mound heights for the establishment of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. largiflorens in the southwest of Western Australia was compared over two years. Double-ridge mounds (seedlings planted in a 0.5-0.9-m-wide trough between the ridges) gave the best survival (50%, averaged for both species, all mound heights and all study sites). In contrast, survival in standard mounds (0.1-m-wide trough) and single ridge mounds (no trough) was only 11% in each case. Survival tended to increase with increasing mound height. In the double-ridge mounds, the improvement was from 35% in 0.25-m-high mounds to 49-59% in 0.5-, 0.75- and 1.0-m-high mounds. There were no significant effects of mound type or mound height on tree height or crown volume index two years after planting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38249015673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0378-1127(92)90123-Q

DO - 10.1016/0378-1127(92)90123-Q

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 89

EP - 98

JO - Forest Ecology and Management

JF - Forest Ecology and Management

SN - 0378-1127

IS - 1-2

ER -