Don’t let’s ask for the moon!”: Reading and viewing the woman’s film

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

When examining popular fiction and its metamorphosis into film it is immediately clear that we are not just concerned with the relationship between an individual book and its cinematic interpretation, but with the history of genre fiction in the two media, and the place it is accorded in literary and film studies respectively. Popular romantic fiction is assigned the position of a “debased” genre and most commonly spoken about in terms of the mass market romance, which nonetheless claims its inspiration from some canonical classics, including Pamela, Pride and Prejudice, and Jane Eyre. In commercial terms it is a lucrative market, but critics regard its content as predictable, ideologically conservative, and undemanding of its reader. With very few nods to historical change, it has a formula which requires little adjustment to maintain its momentum; it has not matured into a literary form with active defenders (such as the fields of science fiction or the crime novel), and even now very few readers are keen to publicize their love of the genre. Romance assumes women are its readers and at the “bottom end” of the market-Mills & Boon or Harlequin-the publishers’ market research has allowed them to consistently produce bestsellers, albeit those where the author’s name is of little consequence. Critical attention was mainly negative until feminist critics reviewed their initial hostility to the manipulativeness of the form and turned their gaze on the woman as reader. From this perspective, and represented by path finding texts such as Tania Modleski’s Loving with a Vengeance (1982) and Janice Radway’s Reading the Romance (1987), there evolved some acute insights into the way women use popular cultural forms to negotiate their own life certainties and to endorse choices that can, without much interrogation, be shown to have little to do with the vicissitudes of relationships and romantic love.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages138-153
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781139001441
ISBN (Print)9780521849623
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reader
Romance
Film Studies
Vicissitudes
Literary Forms
Literary Studies
Names
Interrogation
Crime Novels
Genre Fiction
Market Research
Historical Change
Classical Studies
Metamorphoses
Vengeance
Romantic Love
Bestsellers
Jane Eyre
Science Fiction
Hostility

Cite this

Whelehan, I. (2007). Don’t let’s ask for the moon!”: Reading and viewing the woman’s film. In The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen (pp. 138-153). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521849624.010
Whelehan, Imelda. / Don’t let’s ask for the moon!” : Reading and viewing the woman’s film. The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen. Cambridge University Press, 2007. pp. 138-153
@inbook{07a917d4f21e4e708174d2f5b09dc40e,
title = "Don’t let’s ask for the moon!”: Reading and viewing the woman’s film",
abstract = "When examining popular fiction and its metamorphosis into film it is immediately clear that we are not just concerned with the relationship between an individual book and its cinematic interpretation, but with the history of genre fiction in the two media, and the place it is accorded in literary and film studies respectively. Popular romantic fiction is assigned the position of a “debased” genre and most commonly spoken about in terms of the mass market romance, which nonetheless claims its inspiration from some canonical classics, including Pamela, Pride and Prejudice, and Jane Eyre. In commercial terms it is a lucrative market, but critics regard its content as predictable, ideologically conservative, and undemanding of its reader. With very few nods to historical change, it has a formula which requires little adjustment to maintain its momentum; it has not matured into a literary form with active defenders (such as the fields of science fiction or the crime novel), and even now very few readers are keen to publicize their love of the genre. Romance assumes women are its readers and at the “bottom end” of the market-Mills & Boon or Harlequin-the publishers’ market research has allowed them to consistently produce bestsellers, albeit those where the author’s name is of little consequence. Critical attention was mainly negative until feminist critics reviewed their initial hostility to the manipulativeness of the form and turned their gaze on the woman as reader. From this perspective, and represented by path finding texts such as Tania Modleski’s Loving with a Vengeance (1982) and Janice Radway’s Reading the Romance (1987), there evolved some acute insights into the way women use popular cultural forms to negotiate their own life certainties and to endorse choices that can, without much interrogation, be shown to have little to do with the vicissitudes of relationships and romantic love.",
author = "Imelda Whelehan",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CCOL0521849624.010",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780521849623",
pages = "138--153",
booktitle = "The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Whelehan, I 2007, Don’t let’s ask for the moon!”: Reading and viewing the woman’s film. in The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen. Cambridge University Press, pp. 138-153. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521849624.010

Don’t let’s ask for the moon!” : Reading and viewing the woman’s film. / Whelehan, Imelda.

The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen. Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 138-153.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Don’t let’s ask for the moon!”

T2 - Reading and viewing the woman’s film

AU - Whelehan, Imelda

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - When examining popular fiction and its metamorphosis into film it is immediately clear that we are not just concerned with the relationship between an individual book and its cinematic interpretation, but with the history of genre fiction in the two media, and the place it is accorded in literary and film studies respectively. Popular romantic fiction is assigned the position of a “debased” genre and most commonly spoken about in terms of the mass market romance, which nonetheless claims its inspiration from some canonical classics, including Pamela, Pride and Prejudice, and Jane Eyre. In commercial terms it is a lucrative market, but critics regard its content as predictable, ideologically conservative, and undemanding of its reader. With very few nods to historical change, it has a formula which requires little adjustment to maintain its momentum; it has not matured into a literary form with active defenders (such as the fields of science fiction or the crime novel), and even now very few readers are keen to publicize their love of the genre. Romance assumes women are its readers and at the “bottom end” of the market-Mills & Boon or Harlequin-the publishers’ market research has allowed them to consistently produce bestsellers, albeit those where the author’s name is of little consequence. Critical attention was mainly negative until feminist critics reviewed their initial hostility to the manipulativeness of the form and turned their gaze on the woman as reader. From this perspective, and represented by path finding texts such as Tania Modleski’s Loving with a Vengeance (1982) and Janice Radway’s Reading the Romance (1987), there evolved some acute insights into the way women use popular cultural forms to negotiate their own life certainties and to endorse choices that can, without much interrogation, be shown to have little to do with the vicissitudes of relationships and romantic love.

AB - When examining popular fiction and its metamorphosis into film it is immediately clear that we are not just concerned with the relationship between an individual book and its cinematic interpretation, but with the history of genre fiction in the two media, and the place it is accorded in literary and film studies respectively. Popular romantic fiction is assigned the position of a “debased” genre and most commonly spoken about in terms of the mass market romance, which nonetheless claims its inspiration from some canonical classics, including Pamela, Pride and Prejudice, and Jane Eyre. In commercial terms it is a lucrative market, but critics regard its content as predictable, ideologically conservative, and undemanding of its reader. With very few nods to historical change, it has a formula which requires little adjustment to maintain its momentum; it has not matured into a literary form with active defenders (such as the fields of science fiction or the crime novel), and even now very few readers are keen to publicize their love of the genre. Romance assumes women are its readers and at the “bottom end” of the market-Mills & Boon or Harlequin-the publishers’ market research has allowed them to consistently produce bestsellers, albeit those where the author’s name is of little consequence. Critical attention was mainly negative until feminist critics reviewed their initial hostility to the manipulativeness of the form and turned their gaze on the woman as reader. From this perspective, and represented by path finding texts such as Tania Modleski’s Loving with a Vengeance (1982) and Janice Radway’s Reading the Romance (1987), there evolved some acute insights into the way women use popular cultural forms to negotiate their own life certainties and to endorse choices that can, without much interrogation, be shown to have little to do with the vicissitudes of relationships and romantic love.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956317357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CCOL0521849624.010

DO - 10.1017/CCOL0521849624.010

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780521849623

SP - 138

EP - 153

BT - The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Whelehan I. Don’t let’s ask for the moon!”: Reading and viewing the woman’s film. In The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen. Cambridge University Press. 2007. p. 138-153 https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521849624.010