Dog ownership, the natural outdoor environment and health: A cross-sectional study

Wilma L. Zijlema, Hayley Christian, Margarita Triguero-Mas, Marta Cirach, Magdalena Van Den Berg, Jolanda Maas, Christopher J. Gidlow, Hanneke Kruize, Wanda Wendel-Vos, Sandra Andrušaitytä, Regina Grazuleviciene, Jill Litt, Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives Dog owners walking their dog in natural outdoor environments (NOE) may benefit from the physical activity facilitated by dog walking and from time spent in nature. However, it is unclear whether dog owners receive additional health benefits associated with having access to NOE above the physical activity benefit of walking with their dog. We investigated associations between dog ownership, walking, time spent in NOE and health and whether these associations differed among those with good and poor access to NOE and those living in green and less green areas. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting The Positive Health Effects of the Natural Outdoor Environment in Typical Populations in Different Regions in Europe project. Participants n=3586 adults from Barcelona (Spain), Doetinchem (the Netherlands), Kaunas (Lithuania) and Stoke-on-Trent (UK). Data collection and analysis We calculated access to NOE with land maps and residential surrounding greenness with satellite data. Leisure time walking, time spent in NOE and general and mental health status were measured using validated questionnaires. Associations were estimated using multilevel analysis with a random intercept defined at the neighbourhood level. Results Dog ownership was associated with higher rates of leisure time walking and time spending in NOE (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.54 and 2.37, 95% CI 2.02 to 2.79, respectively). These associations were stronger in those living within 300 m of a NOE and in greener areas. No consistent associations were found between dog ownership and perceived general or mental health status. Conclusions Compared with non-dog owners, dog owners walked more and spent more time in NOE, especially those living within 300 m of a NOE and in greener areas. The health implications of these relationships should be further investigated. In a largely physically inactive society, dog walking in NOE may be a simple way of promoting physical activity and health.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere023000
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

Ownership
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dogs
Health
Walking
Leisure Activities
Health Status
Mental Health
Lithuania
Multilevel Analysis
Insurance Benefits
Netherlands
Spain

Cite this

Zijlema, W. L., Christian, H., Triguero-Mas, M., Cirach, M., Van Den Berg, M., Maas, J., ... Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2019). Dog ownership, the natural outdoor environment and health: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 9(5), [e023000]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023000
Zijlema, Wilma L. ; Christian, Hayley ; Triguero-Mas, Margarita ; Cirach, Marta ; Van Den Berg, Magdalena ; Maas, Jolanda ; Gidlow, Christopher J. ; Kruize, Hanneke ; Wendel-Vos, Wanda ; Andrušaitytä, Sandra ; Grazuleviciene, Regina ; Litt, Jill ; Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J. / Dog ownership, the natural outdoor environment and health : A cross-sectional study. In: BMJ Open. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 5.
@article{713052508277419fbb7d7ef9f6b0eb4c,
title = "Dog ownership, the natural outdoor environment and health: A cross-sectional study",
abstract = "Objectives Dog owners walking their dog in natural outdoor environments (NOE) may benefit from the physical activity facilitated by dog walking and from time spent in nature. However, it is unclear whether dog owners receive additional health benefits associated with having access to NOE above the physical activity benefit of walking with their dog. We investigated associations between dog ownership, walking, time spent in NOE and health and whether these associations differed among those with good and poor access to NOE and those living in green and less green areas. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting The Positive Health Effects of the Natural Outdoor Environment in Typical Populations in Different Regions in Europe project. Participants n=3586 adults from Barcelona (Spain), Doetinchem (the Netherlands), Kaunas (Lithuania) and Stoke-on-Trent (UK). Data collection and analysis We calculated access to NOE with land maps and residential surrounding greenness with satellite data. Leisure time walking, time spent in NOE and general and mental health status were measured using validated questionnaires. Associations were estimated using multilevel analysis with a random intercept defined at the neighbourhood level. Results Dog ownership was associated with higher rates of leisure time walking and time spending in NOE (OR 2.17, 95{\%} CI 1.86 to 2.54 and 2.37, 95{\%} CI 2.02 to 2.79, respectively). These associations were stronger in those living within 300 m of a NOE and in greener areas. No consistent associations were found between dog ownership and perceived general or mental health status. Conclusions Compared with non-dog owners, dog owners walked more and spent more time in NOE, especially those living within 300 m of a NOE and in greener areas. The health implications of these relationships should be further investigated. In a largely physically inactive society, dog walking in NOE may be a simple way of promoting physical activity and health.",
keywords = "epidemiology, mental health, public health",
author = "Zijlema, {Wilma L.} and Hayley Christian and Margarita Triguero-Mas and Marta Cirach and {Van Den Berg}, Magdalena and Jolanda Maas and Gidlow, {Christopher J.} and Hanneke Kruize and Wanda Wendel-Vos and Sandra Andrušaityt{\"a} and Regina Grazuleviciene and Jill Litt and Nieuwenhuijsen, {Mark J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023000",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ (Open)",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "5",

}

Zijlema, WL, Christian, H, Triguero-Mas, M, Cirach, M, Van Den Berg, M, Maas, J, Gidlow, CJ, Kruize, H, Wendel-Vos, W, Andrušaitytä, S, Grazuleviciene, R, Litt, J & Nieuwenhuijsen, MJ 2019, 'Dog ownership, the natural outdoor environment and health: A cross-sectional study' BMJ Open, vol. 9, no. 5, e023000. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023000

Dog ownership, the natural outdoor environment and health : A cross-sectional study. / Zijlema, Wilma L.; Christian, Hayley; Triguero-Mas, Margarita; Cirach, Marta; Van Den Berg, Magdalena; Maas, Jolanda; Gidlow, Christopher J.; Kruize, Hanneke; Wendel-Vos, Wanda; Andrušaitytä, Sandra; Grazuleviciene, Regina; Litt, Jill; Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 9, No. 5, e023000, 01.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dog ownership, the natural outdoor environment and health

T2 - A cross-sectional study

AU - Zijlema, Wilma L.

AU - Christian, Hayley

AU - Triguero-Mas, Margarita

AU - Cirach, Marta

AU - Van Den Berg, Magdalena

AU - Maas, Jolanda

AU - Gidlow, Christopher J.

AU - Kruize, Hanneke

AU - Wendel-Vos, Wanda

AU - Andrušaitytä, Sandra

AU - Grazuleviciene, Regina

AU - Litt, Jill

AU - Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Objectives Dog owners walking their dog in natural outdoor environments (NOE) may benefit from the physical activity facilitated by dog walking and from time spent in nature. However, it is unclear whether dog owners receive additional health benefits associated with having access to NOE above the physical activity benefit of walking with their dog. We investigated associations between dog ownership, walking, time spent in NOE and health and whether these associations differed among those with good and poor access to NOE and those living in green and less green areas. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting The Positive Health Effects of the Natural Outdoor Environment in Typical Populations in Different Regions in Europe project. Participants n=3586 adults from Barcelona (Spain), Doetinchem (the Netherlands), Kaunas (Lithuania) and Stoke-on-Trent (UK). Data collection and analysis We calculated access to NOE with land maps and residential surrounding greenness with satellite data. Leisure time walking, time spent in NOE and general and mental health status were measured using validated questionnaires. Associations were estimated using multilevel analysis with a random intercept defined at the neighbourhood level. Results Dog ownership was associated with higher rates of leisure time walking and time spending in NOE (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.54 and 2.37, 95% CI 2.02 to 2.79, respectively). These associations were stronger in those living within 300 m of a NOE and in greener areas. No consistent associations were found between dog ownership and perceived general or mental health status. Conclusions Compared with non-dog owners, dog owners walked more and spent more time in NOE, especially those living within 300 m of a NOE and in greener areas. The health implications of these relationships should be further investigated. In a largely physically inactive society, dog walking in NOE may be a simple way of promoting physical activity and health.

AB - Objectives Dog owners walking their dog in natural outdoor environments (NOE) may benefit from the physical activity facilitated by dog walking and from time spent in nature. However, it is unclear whether dog owners receive additional health benefits associated with having access to NOE above the physical activity benefit of walking with their dog. We investigated associations between dog ownership, walking, time spent in NOE and health and whether these associations differed among those with good and poor access to NOE and those living in green and less green areas. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting The Positive Health Effects of the Natural Outdoor Environment in Typical Populations in Different Regions in Europe project. Participants n=3586 adults from Barcelona (Spain), Doetinchem (the Netherlands), Kaunas (Lithuania) and Stoke-on-Trent (UK). Data collection and analysis We calculated access to NOE with land maps and residential surrounding greenness with satellite data. Leisure time walking, time spent in NOE and general and mental health status were measured using validated questionnaires. Associations were estimated using multilevel analysis with a random intercept defined at the neighbourhood level. Results Dog ownership was associated with higher rates of leisure time walking and time spending in NOE (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.54 and 2.37, 95% CI 2.02 to 2.79, respectively). These associations were stronger in those living within 300 m of a NOE and in greener areas. No consistent associations were found between dog ownership and perceived general or mental health status. Conclusions Compared with non-dog owners, dog owners walked more and spent more time in NOE, especially those living within 300 m of a NOE and in greener areas. The health implications of these relationships should be further investigated. In a largely physically inactive society, dog walking in NOE may be a simple way of promoting physical activity and health.

KW - epidemiology

KW - mental health

KW - public health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066604968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023000

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023000

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - BMJ (Open)

JF - BMJ (Open)

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 5

M1 - e023000

ER -

Zijlema WL, Christian H, Triguero-Mas M, Cirach M, Van Den Berg M, Maas J et al. Dog ownership, the natural outdoor environment and health: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019 May 1;9(5). e023000. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023000