Does the aged care funding instrument provide increased funding in residential care? Comparisons with the residential classification scale

G.Z.P. Chan, C.K.L. Chin, Doug Mckitrick, R.W. Warne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To determine whether the Aged Care Funding Instrument (ACFI) provides more funding than the Residential Classification Scale (RCS) for residents in the Hellenic Residential Care Facility. Methods: All residents within the care facility were assessed over a six 6-month period using ACFI, RCS and Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly (CAPE) scores. Differences in funding levels were calculated using ACFI and RCS instruments against a standardised CAPE score. Results: CAPE dependency RCS funding per resident per day varied from $32.20 for grade A to $116.20 for grade E4 residents. CAPE ACFI funding varied from $20.20 for grade A to $127.50 for grade E4. There was no significant difference in mean overall funding between the two scales (ACFI $92.50 vs RCS $90.35, P = 0.76). Conclusions: The ACFI does provide a small but not significant increase in funding to residents in residential care. It redirects funding to higher dependency residents. © 2013 The Authors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-123
JournalAustralasian Journal on Ageing
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

Cite this