Does syntax bias serial order reconstruction of verbal short-term memory?

Timothy Jones, Simon Farrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Existing models of short-term sequence memory can account for effects of long-term knowledge on the recall of individual items, but have rarely addressed the effects of long-term sequential constraints on recall. We examine syntactic constraints on the ordering of words in verbal short-term memory in four experiments. People were found to have better memory for sequences that more strongly conform to English syntax, and that errors in recall tended to make output sequences more syntactic (i.e., a syntactic bias). Model simulations suggest that the syntactic biasing in verbal short-term recall was more likely to be accounted for by a redintegration mechanism acting over multiple items in the sequence. The data were less well predicted by a model in which syntactic constraints operate via the chunking of sequences at encoding. The results highlight that models of short-term memory should be extended to include syntactic constraints from long-term representations—most likely via redintegration mechanisms acting over multiple items—but we also note the challenge of incorporating such constraints into most existing models.

LanguageEnglish
Pages98-122
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume100
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Syntactics
Short-Term Memory
syntax
reconstruction
Data storage equipment
trend
simulation model
Serial Order
Verbal Short-term Memory
Syntax
experiment
Syntactic Constraints
Experiments

Cite this

@article{d982fcc9a0bf4187928d2cef74fc8c2d,
title = "Does syntax bias serial order reconstruction of verbal short-term memory?",
abstract = "Existing models of short-term sequence memory can account for effects of long-term knowledge on the recall of individual items, but have rarely addressed the effects of long-term sequential constraints on recall. We examine syntactic constraints on the ordering of words in verbal short-term memory in four experiments. People were found to have better memory for sequences that more strongly conform to English syntax, and that errors in recall tended to make output sequences more syntactic (i.e., a syntactic bias). Model simulations suggest that the syntactic biasing in verbal short-term recall was more likely to be accounted for by a redintegration mechanism acting over multiple items in the sequence. The data were less well predicted by a model in which syntactic constraints operate via the chunking of sequences at encoding. The results highlight that models of short-term memory should be extended to include syntactic constraints from long-term representations—most likely via redintegration mechanisms acting over multiple items—but we also note the challenge of incorporating such constraints into most existing models.",
keywords = "Chunking, Long-term knowledge, Redintegration, Syntax, Working memory",
author = "Timothy Jones and Simon Farrell",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2018.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "98--122",
journal = "Journal of Memory & Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

Does syntax bias serial order reconstruction of verbal short-term memory? / Jones, Timothy; Farrell, Simon.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 100, 01.06.2018, p. 98-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does syntax bias serial order reconstruction of verbal short-term memory?

AU - Jones,Timothy

AU - Farrell,Simon

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Existing models of short-term sequence memory can account for effects of long-term knowledge on the recall of individual items, but have rarely addressed the effects of long-term sequential constraints on recall. We examine syntactic constraints on the ordering of words in verbal short-term memory in four experiments. People were found to have better memory for sequences that more strongly conform to English syntax, and that errors in recall tended to make output sequences more syntactic (i.e., a syntactic bias). Model simulations suggest that the syntactic biasing in verbal short-term recall was more likely to be accounted for by a redintegration mechanism acting over multiple items in the sequence. The data were less well predicted by a model in which syntactic constraints operate via the chunking of sequences at encoding. The results highlight that models of short-term memory should be extended to include syntactic constraints from long-term representations—most likely via redintegration mechanisms acting over multiple items—but we also note the challenge of incorporating such constraints into most existing models.

AB - Existing models of short-term sequence memory can account for effects of long-term knowledge on the recall of individual items, but have rarely addressed the effects of long-term sequential constraints on recall. We examine syntactic constraints on the ordering of words in verbal short-term memory in four experiments. People were found to have better memory for sequences that more strongly conform to English syntax, and that errors in recall tended to make output sequences more syntactic (i.e., a syntactic bias). Model simulations suggest that the syntactic biasing in verbal short-term recall was more likely to be accounted for by a redintegration mechanism acting over multiple items in the sequence. The data were less well predicted by a model in which syntactic constraints operate via the chunking of sequences at encoding. The results highlight that models of short-term memory should be extended to include syntactic constraints from long-term representations—most likely via redintegration mechanisms acting over multiple items—but we also note the challenge of incorporating such constraints into most existing models.

KW - Chunking

KW - Long-term knowledge

KW - Redintegration

KW - Syntax

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042716916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2018.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2018.02.001

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 98

EP - 122

JO - Journal of Memory & Language

T2 - Journal of Memory & Language

JF - Journal of Memory & Language

SN - 0749-596X

ER -