Does mud always stick? Investigating the conditions necessary for retracted misinformation to continue to influence person impressions

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This thesis investigates the continued influence effect (CIE) of retracted misinformation on person impressions. A corpus of behaviour statements were developed which informed a series of experimental studies. The experimental series explored factors that may moderate a CIE in person impressions, including misinformation valence, misinformation coherence, task features, and pre-existing beliefs (e.g., mental health stigma). Findings show retracted person-related misinformation is generally less robust than retracted event-related misinformation. However, pre-existing beliefs can contribute to a CIE in person impressions. This work developed an improved corpus of behaviour statements for future research and highlights the complexities of correcting person-related misinformation.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • The University of Western Australia
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Fay, Nicolas, Supervisor
  • Ecker, Ullrich, Supervisor
Thesis sponsors
Award date4 Jun 2025
DOIs
Publication statusUnpublished - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does mud always stick? Investigating the conditions necessary for retracted misinformation to continue to influence person impressions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this