TY - JOUR
T1 - Does Competitive Action Intensity Influence Team Performance via Leader Bottom-Line Mentality? A Social Information Processing Perspective
AU - Ren, Shuang
AU - Mawritz, Mary B.
AU - Greenbaum, Rebecca L.
AU - Babalola, Mayowa
AU - Wang, Zhining
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Leader bottom-line mentality (LBLM) exists when leaders solely focus on securing bottom-line outcomes to the exclusion of alternative considerations. Our research examines why leaders adopt LBLMs and the implications of this focused leadership strategy on team sales performance and pro-environmental behavior. Utilizing social information processing theory, we examine LBLM as a mediator and contend that competitive action intensity in the work environment provokes LBLM, which then signals to teams the importance of raising sales performance and reducing pro-environmental behavior. We also suggest that leader performance reward expectancy (i.e., perceptions that rewards are directly tied to high performance) serves as a first-stage moderator and team performance reward expectancy serves as a second-stage moderator, with higher (vs. lower) levels of each strengthening the indirect effects of competitive action intensity, through LBLM, onto team sales performance and pro-environmental behavior. Utilizing field data from a large pharmaceutical company (Study 1) as well as an experimental causal chain design (Studies 2a and 2b), we found support for our theoretical model.
AB - Leader bottom-line mentality (LBLM) exists when leaders solely focus on securing bottom-line outcomes to the exclusion of alternative considerations. Our research examines why leaders adopt LBLMs and the implications of this focused leadership strategy on team sales performance and pro-environmental behavior. Utilizing social information processing theory, we examine LBLM as a mediator and contend that competitive action intensity in the work environment provokes LBLM, which then signals to teams the importance of raising sales performance and reducing pro-environmental behavior. We also suggest that leader performance reward expectancy (i.e., perceptions that rewards are directly tied to high performance) serves as a first-stage moderator and team performance reward expectancy serves as a second-stage moderator, with higher (vs. lower) levels of each strengthening the indirect effects of competitive action intensity, through LBLM, onto team sales performance and pro-environmental behavior. Utilizing field data from a large pharmaceutical company (Study 1) as well as an experimental causal chain design (Studies 2a and 2b), we found support for our theoretical model.
KW - Leader bottom-line mentality
KW - COMPETITIVE ACTION INTENSITY
KW - Performance reward expectancy
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001148774800001
U2 - 10.1037/apl0001166
DO - 10.1037/apl0001166
M3 - Article
C2 - 38270991
SN - 0021-9010
VL - 109
SP - 811-–828
JO - Journal of Applied Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied Psychology
IS - 6
ER -