Does clinician continuity influence hearing aid outcomes?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)


    Objective: To evaluate whether clinician continuity is associated with successful hearing aid outcomes. Design: A prospective cohort study. Clinician continuity was defined as occurring when a patient was cared for by the same clinician for the hearing assessment, hearing aid selection process, hearing aid fitting and programming, and subsequent hearing aid fine tuning appointments. The hearing aid outcome measures included self-reported hearing aid use, benefit and satisfaction as well as self-reported handling skills and problems experienced with hearing aids. Study sample: Four hundred and sixty-eight adult hearing aid users (mean age 73.9 years ±10.9) and 26 qualified audiologists (mean age 34 years ±6.34) recruited from a single hearing clinic in Perth, Western Australia. Results: There were no significant differences in hearing aid outcomes between participants who experienced clinician continuity and those who did not. Conclusions: Within a controlled practice setting, hearing aid outcomes may not be adversely effected if services are provided by more than one clinician.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)556-563
    Number of pages8
    JournalInternational Journal of Audiology
    Issue number10
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2016


    Dive into the research topics of 'Does clinician continuity influence hearing aid outcomes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this