Does Choice of Law Matter?

Michael Douglas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We ought to rethink how we understand the conflict of laws in Australia with respect to forum statutes. This is an important issue: the proper treatment of ambiguous statutes is the focus of many, if not the vast majority of cases, including cross-border cases. Statutory interpretation is the primary means by which Australian courts must resolve cross-border disputes of subject matter that may engage forum statutes. This proposition requires criticism of the orthodox approach to choice of law, including the acceptance of 'mandatory law' as a concept for application by common law courts. 'Choice of law', in the traditional sense of its traditional techniques, still matters, but statutory interpretation with reference to text, context and purpose matters more in the actual life of the law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalAustralian International Law Journal
Volume28
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Choice of Law Matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this