Do upstream migrating, juvenile amphidromous shrimps, provide a marine subsidy to river ecosystems?

Peter A. Novak, Peter Bayliss, David A. Crook, Erica A. Garcia, Brad Pusey, Michael Douglas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The upstream migration of juvenile amphidromous shrimps has been proposed as a source of marine or estuarine-derived nutrients into fresh water. Little is known about the size and ecological importance of any such subsidy as there have been few observational or empirical studies on the topic. We investigated the upstream migration of the amphidromous shrimp, Macrobrachium spinipes (Palaemonidae) in the Daly River, of tropical northern Australia, to determine migration phenology, estimate migration biomass and determine whether migrating shrimps transport marine-derived energy and nutrients upstream. Field observations over 2 years revealed that juvenile M. spinipes migrate upstream en masse during extended periods of declining discharge over a period of 4-6 weeks during the wet season (March-May). In addition, juvenile atyid shrimps from the genus Caridina were also observed migrating upstream during the same period. Fine-scale sampling using fyke nets over 2 years (2013 and 2014) consistently found discharge to be the strongest predictor of M. spinipes and Caridina spp. biomass, while moon illumination and cloud cover were also important predictors. An estimated 10-20 million shrimps migrated upstream during each wet season, transporting c. 100 kg of carbon and c. 28 kg of nitrogen per year. Muscle sulphur stable isotopes (δ34S) and exoskeleton strontium isotope ratios (87Sr/86Sr) were used to establish if marine carbon was transported upstream by the juvenile M. spinipes. Isotope data from migratory M. spinipes were compared to the non-migratory freshwater Macrobrachium bullatum. No evidence of a marine signature in body tissue or exoskeleton was found using either technique, suggesting very rapid turnover of body tissues This study provides key insights into the migration phenology of amphidromous shrimps and, importantly, suggests that migrating M. spinipes do not transport significant amounts of marine-derived energy and nutrients across the marine/freshwater ecotone.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)880-893
JournalFreshwater Biology
Volume62
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Fingerprint

subsidies
shrimp
rivers
ecosystems
ecosystem
exoskeleton
river
Macrobrachium
wet season
phenology
nutrient
isotopes
nutrients
strontium isotope
carbon
sulfur isotope
biomass
ecotone
Palaemonidae
strontium

Cite this

Novak, Peter A. ; Bayliss, Peter ; Crook, David A. ; Garcia, Erica A. ; Pusey, Brad ; Douglas, Michael. / Do upstream migrating, juvenile amphidromous shrimps, provide a marine subsidy to river ecosystems?. In: Freshwater Biology. 2017 ; Vol. 62, No. 5. pp. 880-893.
@article{d557fc88b2f1471e9746ed3f7c2ecbf7,
title = "Do upstream migrating, juvenile amphidromous shrimps, provide a marine subsidy to river ecosystems?",
abstract = "The upstream migration of juvenile amphidromous shrimps has been proposed as a source of marine or estuarine-derived nutrients into fresh water. Little is known about the size and ecological importance of any such subsidy as there have been few observational or empirical studies on the topic. We investigated the upstream migration of the amphidromous shrimp, Macrobrachium spinipes (Palaemonidae) in the Daly River, of tropical northern Australia, to determine migration phenology, estimate migration biomass and determine whether migrating shrimps transport marine-derived energy and nutrients upstream. Field observations over 2 years revealed that juvenile M. spinipes migrate upstream en masse during extended periods of declining discharge over a period of 4-6 weeks during the wet season (March-May). In addition, juvenile atyid shrimps from the genus Caridina were also observed migrating upstream during the same period. Fine-scale sampling using fyke nets over 2 years (2013 and 2014) consistently found discharge to be the strongest predictor of M. spinipes and Caridina spp. biomass, while moon illumination and cloud cover were also important predictors. An estimated 10-20 million shrimps migrated upstream during each wet season, transporting c. 100 kg of carbon and c. 28 kg of nitrogen per year. Muscle sulphur stable isotopes (δ34S) and exoskeleton strontium isotope ratios (87Sr/86Sr) were used to establish if marine carbon was transported upstream by the juvenile M. spinipes. Isotope data from migratory M. spinipes were compared to the non-migratory freshwater Macrobrachium bullatum. No evidence of a marine signature in body tissue or exoskeleton was found using either technique, suggesting very rapid turnover of body tissues This study provides key insights into the migration phenology of amphidromous shrimps and, importantly, suggests that migrating M. spinipes do not transport significant amounts of marine-derived energy and nutrients across the marine/freshwater ecotone.",
keywords = "Macrobrachium, Caridina, Food web, Northern Australia, Subsidy",
author = "Novak, {Peter A.} and Peter Bayliss and Crook, {David A.} and Garcia, {Erica A.} and Brad Pusey and Michael Douglas",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/fwb.12907",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "880--893",
journal = "Freshwater Biology",
issn = "0046-5070",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "5",

}

Do upstream migrating, juvenile amphidromous shrimps, provide a marine subsidy to river ecosystems? / Novak, Peter A.; Bayliss, Peter; Crook, David A.; Garcia, Erica A.; Pusey, Brad; Douglas, Michael.

In: Freshwater Biology, Vol. 62, No. 5, 05.2017, p. 880-893.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do upstream migrating, juvenile amphidromous shrimps, provide a marine subsidy to river ecosystems?

AU - Novak, Peter A.

AU - Bayliss, Peter

AU - Crook, David A.

AU - Garcia, Erica A.

AU - Pusey, Brad

AU - Douglas, Michael

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - The upstream migration of juvenile amphidromous shrimps has been proposed as a source of marine or estuarine-derived nutrients into fresh water. Little is known about the size and ecological importance of any such subsidy as there have been few observational or empirical studies on the topic. We investigated the upstream migration of the amphidromous shrimp, Macrobrachium spinipes (Palaemonidae) in the Daly River, of tropical northern Australia, to determine migration phenology, estimate migration biomass and determine whether migrating shrimps transport marine-derived energy and nutrients upstream. Field observations over 2 years revealed that juvenile M. spinipes migrate upstream en masse during extended periods of declining discharge over a period of 4-6 weeks during the wet season (March-May). In addition, juvenile atyid shrimps from the genus Caridina were also observed migrating upstream during the same period. Fine-scale sampling using fyke nets over 2 years (2013 and 2014) consistently found discharge to be the strongest predictor of M. spinipes and Caridina spp. biomass, while moon illumination and cloud cover were also important predictors. An estimated 10-20 million shrimps migrated upstream during each wet season, transporting c. 100 kg of carbon and c. 28 kg of nitrogen per year. Muscle sulphur stable isotopes (δ34S) and exoskeleton strontium isotope ratios (87Sr/86Sr) were used to establish if marine carbon was transported upstream by the juvenile M. spinipes. Isotope data from migratory M. spinipes were compared to the non-migratory freshwater Macrobrachium bullatum. No evidence of a marine signature in body tissue or exoskeleton was found using either technique, suggesting very rapid turnover of body tissues This study provides key insights into the migration phenology of amphidromous shrimps and, importantly, suggests that migrating M. spinipes do not transport significant amounts of marine-derived energy and nutrients across the marine/freshwater ecotone.

AB - The upstream migration of juvenile amphidromous shrimps has been proposed as a source of marine or estuarine-derived nutrients into fresh water. Little is known about the size and ecological importance of any such subsidy as there have been few observational or empirical studies on the topic. We investigated the upstream migration of the amphidromous shrimp, Macrobrachium spinipes (Palaemonidae) in the Daly River, of tropical northern Australia, to determine migration phenology, estimate migration biomass and determine whether migrating shrimps transport marine-derived energy and nutrients upstream. Field observations over 2 years revealed that juvenile M. spinipes migrate upstream en masse during extended periods of declining discharge over a period of 4-6 weeks during the wet season (March-May). In addition, juvenile atyid shrimps from the genus Caridina were also observed migrating upstream during the same period. Fine-scale sampling using fyke nets over 2 years (2013 and 2014) consistently found discharge to be the strongest predictor of M. spinipes and Caridina spp. biomass, while moon illumination and cloud cover were also important predictors. An estimated 10-20 million shrimps migrated upstream during each wet season, transporting c. 100 kg of carbon and c. 28 kg of nitrogen per year. Muscle sulphur stable isotopes (δ34S) and exoskeleton strontium isotope ratios (87Sr/86Sr) were used to establish if marine carbon was transported upstream by the juvenile M. spinipes. Isotope data from migratory M. spinipes were compared to the non-migratory freshwater Macrobrachium bullatum. No evidence of a marine signature in body tissue or exoskeleton was found using either technique, suggesting very rapid turnover of body tissues This study provides key insights into the migration phenology of amphidromous shrimps and, importantly, suggests that migrating M. spinipes do not transport significant amounts of marine-derived energy and nutrients across the marine/freshwater ecotone.

KW - Macrobrachium

KW - Caridina

KW - Food web

KW - Northern Australia

KW - Subsidy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013392761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/fwb.12907

DO - 10.1111/fwb.12907

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 880

EP - 893

JO - Freshwater Biology

JF - Freshwater Biology

SN - 0046-5070

IS - 5

ER -