Do unattractive friends make you look better? Context-dependent male mating preferences in the guppy

Clelia Gasparini, G. Serena, A. Pilastro

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    57 Citations (Scopus)


    Recent theory predicts that in species where females tend to mate with the relatively most ornamented males, males may increase their attractiveness to females, and hence mating success, by preferentially associating with females that are surrounded by less ornamented competitors. Despite this prediction, we still lack explicit experimental evidence that males strategically prefer females surrounded by less attractive competitors to maximize their relative attractiveness. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive test of this hypothesis in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a species where a female's perception of a male's attractiveness depends on his coloration relative to that of surrounding males. We found that males preferentially associated with females that were surrounded by relatively drab competitors, and that the strength of an individual male's preference was negatively correlated with his level of ornamentation. A series of control experiments made it possible to exclude the potentially confounding effects of male-male competition or social motivations when drawing these conclusions. The ability of males to choose social context to increase their relative attractiveness has important evolutionary consequences, for example, by contributing towards the maintenance of variability in male sexual ornamentation despite the strong directional selection exerted by female preferences. © 2013 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)7pp
    JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
    Publication statusPublished - 2013


    Dive into the research topics of 'Do unattractive friends make you look better? Context-dependent male mating preferences in the guppy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this