Diversifying Australia’s Indo-Pacific infrastructure diplomacy

Jeffrey Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Infrastructure is an emerging component of Australian diplomacy. In recent years, many infrastructure and connectivity (I&C) programs have been launched in the Indo-Pacific, designed to close the ‘infrastructure gaps’ that plague the region. Competition amongst these, particularly between US and Chinese offerings, has posed a dilemma for Australian foreign policy. Australia has struggled to articulate a policy on China’s Belt and Road Initiative that balances strategic concerns against economic opportunities; while enthusiastic engagement with US alternatives risks perceptions of ‘choosing’ sides between the region’s two main powers. Yet the contemporary marketplace for Indo-Pacific I&C is much broader, with programs recently launched by many governments and regional organisations. These presents an opportunity for Australia to diversify its infrastructure diplomacy, particularly through engagement with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, cooperation with Japan and new avenues for commercial diplomacy. By engaging with a wider range of I&C partners and institutions, Australia can better integrate itself with the emerging infrastructure systems of the Indo-Pacific.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-108
Number of pages8
JournalAustralian Journal of International Affairs
Volume73
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

diplomacy
infrastructure
risk perception
foreign policy
connectivity
bank
Japan
road
China
economics

Cite this

@article{73341189b89047598f3be9ee7c52816e,
title = "Diversifying Australia’s Indo-Pacific infrastructure diplomacy",
abstract = "Infrastructure is an emerging component of Australian diplomacy. In recent years, many infrastructure and connectivity (I&C) programs have been launched in the Indo-Pacific, designed to close the ‘infrastructure gaps’ that plague the region. Competition amongst these, particularly between US and Chinese offerings, has posed a dilemma for Australian foreign policy. Australia has struggled to articulate a policy on China’s Belt and Road Initiative that balances strategic concerns against economic opportunities; while enthusiastic engagement with US alternatives risks perceptions of ‘choosing’ sides between the region’s two main powers. Yet the contemporary marketplace for Indo-Pacific I&C is much broader, with programs recently launched by many governments and regional organisations. These presents an opportunity for Australia to diversify its infrastructure diplomacy, particularly through engagement with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, cooperation with Japan and new avenues for commercial diplomacy. By engaging with a wider range of I&C partners and institutions, Australia can better integrate itself with the emerging infrastructure systems of the Indo-Pacific.",
keywords = "Australia, China, Indo-Pacific, Infrastructure, regionalism, United States",
author = "Jeffrey Wilson",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10357718.2019.1583169",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "101--108",
journal = "Australian Journal of International Affairs",
issn = "1035-7718",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Diversifying Australia’s Indo-Pacific infrastructure diplomacy. / Wilson, Jeffrey.

In: Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 2, 04.03.2019, p. 101-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diversifying Australia’s Indo-Pacific infrastructure diplomacy

AU - Wilson, Jeffrey

PY - 2019/3/4

Y1 - 2019/3/4

N2 - Infrastructure is an emerging component of Australian diplomacy. In recent years, many infrastructure and connectivity (I&C) programs have been launched in the Indo-Pacific, designed to close the ‘infrastructure gaps’ that plague the region. Competition amongst these, particularly between US and Chinese offerings, has posed a dilemma for Australian foreign policy. Australia has struggled to articulate a policy on China’s Belt and Road Initiative that balances strategic concerns against economic opportunities; while enthusiastic engagement with US alternatives risks perceptions of ‘choosing’ sides between the region’s two main powers. Yet the contemporary marketplace for Indo-Pacific I&C is much broader, with programs recently launched by many governments and regional organisations. These presents an opportunity for Australia to diversify its infrastructure diplomacy, particularly through engagement with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, cooperation with Japan and new avenues for commercial diplomacy. By engaging with a wider range of I&C partners and institutions, Australia can better integrate itself with the emerging infrastructure systems of the Indo-Pacific.

AB - Infrastructure is an emerging component of Australian diplomacy. In recent years, many infrastructure and connectivity (I&C) programs have been launched in the Indo-Pacific, designed to close the ‘infrastructure gaps’ that plague the region. Competition amongst these, particularly between US and Chinese offerings, has posed a dilemma for Australian foreign policy. Australia has struggled to articulate a policy on China’s Belt and Road Initiative that balances strategic concerns against economic opportunities; while enthusiastic engagement with US alternatives risks perceptions of ‘choosing’ sides between the region’s two main powers. Yet the contemporary marketplace for Indo-Pacific I&C is much broader, with programs recently launched by many governments and regional organisations. These presents an opportunity for Australia to diversify its infrastructure diplomacy, particularly through engagement with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, cooperation with Japan and new avenues for commercial diplomacy. By engaging with a wider range of I&C partners and institutions, Australia can better integrate itself with the emerging infrastructure systems of the Indo-Pacific.

KW - Australia

KW - China

KW - Indo-Pacific

KW - Infrastructure

KW - regionalism

KW - United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062362952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10357718.2019.1583169

DO - 10.1080/10357718.2019.1583169

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 73

SP - 101

EP - 108

JO - Australian Journal of International Affairs

JF - Australian Journal of International Affairs

SN - 1035-7718

IS - 2

ER -