Distributional consequences of upstream tree plantations on downstream water users in a Public-Private Benefit Framework

T.L. Nordblom, I.H. Hume, John Finlayson, David Pannell, J.E. Holland, A.J. Mcclintock

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    186 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    © 2015. We apply a Public-Private Benefit Framework (PPBF) for new perspectives on the distributional consequences of land-use change in upstream watersheds (wide expansion of tree plantations) negatively affecting downstream water users. Our study area is the Macquarie River catchment in central-west New South Wales, as part of Australia's Murray-Darling Basin, where active water entitlement markets exist downstream.We consider benefits and costs to private upstream landholders allowed to establish new plantations without regard to reduced water flows and qualities to downstream users (urban, agricultural and environmental).Second, we explore a policy requiring new plantations to purchase permanent entitlements in advance for amounts of water they will divert from downstream uses; the calculated increase in evapotranspiration above that of current land-use.With no requirement to purchase entitlements, new plantation areas and their increased water consumption would be greatest, as would negative impacts on downstream water users.Some downstream water users are assumed willing to surrender entitlements at lower prices than others, resulting in an upward-sloping supply curve. Demand for entitlements by new upstream plantations will be functions of anticipated tree product yields, prices, establishment and opportunity costs. Their aggregate demand is downward sloping and intersects the supply curve to define the equilibrium quantity and price of water entitlements traded.With a tree product price of $70/m3 the economic consequences of unrestricted expansion of planting in the upper watersheds could be in the order of $639M (tree-NPV, 7%) in upstream private net benefit gains, but $388M in uncompensated losses to downstream public net benefits, counting losses of 154GL in environmental flows valued at $1M/GL, for total catchment net benefits of $251M.The policy as confirmed by our PPBF, indicates "flexible negative incentives" to reduce the expansion of new private plantations by compensating downstream public losses through sale of water entitlements from the latter to the former. Assuming that environmental flows are protected and purchase of downstream water entitlements is required from irrigators and stock and domestic users for new tree plantations, net private benefits of $192M to new plantations are added to $138M in downstream public benefits, improving the net change in catchment benefits to $330M. The policy would improve total net catchment benefit from $251M to $330M, achieving an economically efficient, socially equitable and environmentally sustainable solution, which adjusts automatically over time through the market.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)271-281
    Number of pages11
    JournalAgricultural Systems
    Volume139
    Early online date22 Sep 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015

    Fingerprint

    plantations
    water
    markets
    opportunity costs
    social benefit
    New South Wales
    land use change
    sales
    water flow
    evapotranspiration
    water quality
    land use
    planting
    basins
    economics
    rivers

    Cite this

    Nordblom, T.L. ; Hume, I.H. ; Finlayson, John ; Pannell, David ; Holland, J.E. ; Mcclintock, A.J. / Distributional consequences of upstream tree plantations on downstream water users in a Public-Private Benefit Framework. In: Agricultural Systems. 2015 ; Vol. 139. pp. 271-281.
    @article{436d33fdedf44024a79c0aff5a517ae4,
    title = "Distributional consequences of upstream tree plantations on downstream water users in a Public-Private Benefit Framework",
    abstract = "{\circledC} 2015. We apply a Public-Private Benefit Framework (PPBF) for new perspectives on the distributional consequences of land-use change in upstream watersheds (wide expansion of tree plantations) negatively affecting downstream water users. Our study area is the Macquarie River catchment in central-west New South Wales, as part of Australia's Murray-Darling Basin, where active water entitlement markets exist downstream.We consider benefits and costs to private upstream landholders allowed to establish new plantations without regard to reduced water flows and qualities to downstream users (urban, agricultural and environmental).Second, we explore a policy requiring new plantations to purchase permanent entitlements in advance for amounts of water they will divert from downstream uses; the calculated increase in evapotranspiration above that of current land-use.With no requirement to purchase entitlements, new plantation areas and their increased water consumption would be greatest, as would negative impacts on downstream water users.Some downstream water users are assumed willing to surrender entitlements at lower prices than others, resulting in an upward-sloping supply curve. Demand for entitlements by new upstream plantations will be functions of anticipated tree product yields, prices, establishment and opportunity costs. Their aggregate demand is downward sloping and intersects the supply curve to define the equilibrium quantity and price of water entitlements traded.With a tree product price of $70/m3 the economic consequences of unrestricted expansion of planting in the upper watersheds could be in the order of $639M (tree-NPV, 7{\%}) in upstream private net benefit gains, but $388M in uncompensated losses to downstream public net benefits, counting losses of 154GL in environmental flows valued at $1M/GL, for total catchment net benefits of $251M.The policy as confirmed by our PPBF, indicates {"}flexible negative incentives{"} to reduce the expansion of new private plantations by compensating downstream public losses through sale of water entitlements from the latter to the former. Assuming that environmental flows are protected and purchase of downstream water entitlements is required from irrigators and stock and domestic users for new tree plantations, net private benefits of $192M to new plantations are added to $138M in downstream public benefits, improving the net change in catchment benefits to $330M. The policy would improve total net catchment benefit from $251M to $330M, achieving an economically efficient, socially equitable and environmentally sustainable solution, which adjusts automatically over time through the market.",
    author = "T.L. Nordblom and I.H. Hume and John Finlayson and David Pannell and J.E. Holland and A.J. Mcclintock",
    year = "2015",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1016/j.agsy.2015.07.008",
    language = "English",
    volume = "139",
    pages = "271--281",
    journal = "Agricultural Systems",
    issn = "0308-521X",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Distributional consequences of upstream tree plantations on downstream water users in a Public-Private Benefit Framework. / Nordblom, T.L.; Hume, I.H.; Finlayson, John; Pannell, David; Holland, J.E.; Mcclintock, A.J.

    In: Agricultural Systems, Vol. 139, 10.2015, p. 271-281.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Distributional consequences of upstream tree plantations on downstream water users in a Public-Private Benefit Framework

    AU - Nordblom, T.L.

    AU - Hume, I.H.

    AU - Finlayson, John

    AU - Pannell, David

    AU - Holland, J.E.

    AU - Mcclintock, A.J.

    PY - 2015/10

    Y1 - 2015/10

    N2 - © 2015. We apply a Public-Private Benefit Framework (PPBF) for new perspectives on the distributional consequences of land-use change in upstream watersheds (wide expansion of tree plantations) negatively affecting downstream water users. Our study area is the Macquarie River catchment in central-west New South Wales, as part of Australia's Murray-Darling Basin, where active water entitlement markets exist downstream.We consider benefits and costs to private upstream landholders allowed to establish new plantations without regard to reduced water flows and qualities to downstream users (urban, agricultural and environmental).Second, we explore a policy requiring new plantations to purchase permanent entitlements in advance for amounts of water they will divert from downstream uses; the calculated increase in evapotranspiration above that of current land-use.With no requirement to purchase entitlements, new plantation areas and their increased water consumption would be greatest, as would negative impacts on downstream water users.Some downstream water users are assumed willing to surrender entitlements at lower prices than others, resulting in an upward-sloping supply curve. Demand for entitlements by new upstream plantations will be functions of anticipated tree product yields, prices, establishment and opportunity costs. Their aggregate demand is downward sloping and intersects the supply curve to define the equilibrium quantity and price of water entitlements traded.With a tree product price of $70/m3 the economic consequences of unrestricted expansion of planting in the upper watersheds could be in the order of $639M (tree-NPV, 7%) in upstream private net benefit gains, but $388M in uncompensated losses to downstream public net benefits, counting losses of 154GL in environmental flows valued at $1M/GL, for total catchment net benefits of $251M.The policy as confirmed by our PPBF, indicates "flexible negative incentives" to reduce the expansion of new private plantations by compensating downstream public losses through sale of water entitlements from the latter to the former. Assuming that environmental flows are protected and purchase of downstream water entitlements is required from irrigators and stock and domestic users for new tree plantations, net private benefits of $192M to new plantations are added to $138M in downstream public benefits, improving the net change in catchment benefits to $330M. The policy would improve total net catchment benefit from $251M to $330M, achieving an economically efficient, socially equitable and environmentally sustainable solution, which adjusts automatically over time through the market.

    AB - © 2015. We apply a Public-Private Benefit Framework (PPBF) for new perspectives on the distributional consequences of land-use change in upstream watersheds (wide expansion of tree plantations) negatively affecting downstream water users. Our study area is the Macquarie River catchment in central-west New South Wales, as part of Australia's Murray-Darling Basin, where active water entitlement markets exist downstream.We consider benefits and costs to private upstream landholders allowed to establish new plantations without regard to reduced water flows and qualities to downstream users (urban, agricultural and environmental).Second, we explore a policy requiring new plantations to purchase permanent entitlements in advance for amounts of water they will divert from downstream uses; the calculated increase in evapotranspiration above that of current land-use.With no requirement to purchase entitlements, new plantation areas and their increased water consumption would be greatest, as would negative impacts on downstream water users.Some downstream water users are assumed willing to surrender entitlements at lower prices than others, resulting in an upward-sloping supply curve. Demand for entitlements by new upstream plantations will be functions of anticipated tree product yields, prices, establishment and opportunity costs. Their aggregate demand is downward sloping and intersects the supply curve to define the equilibrium quantity and price of water entitlements traded.With a tree product price of $70/m3 the economic consequences of unrestricted expansion of planting in the upper watersheds could be in the order of $639M (tree-NPV, 7%) in upstream private net benefit gains, but $388M in uncompensated losses to downstream public net benefits, counting losses of 154GL in environmental flows valued at $1M/GL, for total catchment net benefits of $251M.The policy as confirmed by our PPBF, indicates "flexible negative incentives" to reduce the expansion of new private plantations by compensating downstream public losses through sale of water entitlements from the latter to the former. Assuming that environmental flows are protected and purchase of downstream water entitlements is required from irrigators and stock and domestic users for new tree plantations, net private benefits of $192M to new plantations are added to $138M in downstream public benefits, improving the net change in catchment benefits to $330M. The policy would improve total net catchment benefit from $251M to $330M, achieving an economically efficient, socially equitable and environmentally sustainable solution, which adjusts automatically over time through the market.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.07.008

    DO - 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.07.008

    M3 - Article

    VL - 139

    SP - 271

    EP - 281

    JO - Agricultural Systems

    JF - Agricultural Systems

    SN - 0308-521X

    ER -