Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study

Martin R. Vasilev, Fabrice Br Parmentier, Bernhard Angele, Julie A. Kirkby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Oddball studies have shown that sounds unexpectedly deviating from an otherwise repeated sequence capture attention away from the task at hand. While such distraction is typically regarded as potentially important in everyday life, previous work has so far not examined how deviant sounds affect performance on more complex daily tasks. In this study, we developed a new method to examine whether deviant sounds can disrupt reading performance by recording participants' eye movements. Participants read single sentences in silence and while listening to task-irrelevant sounds. In the latter condition, a 50-ms sound was played contingent on the fixation of five target words in the sentence. On most occasions, the same tone was presented (standard sound), whereas on rare and unexpected occasions it was replaced by white noise (deviant sound). The deviant sound resulted in significantly longer fixation durations on the target words relative to the standard sound. A time-course analysis showed that the deviant sound began to affect fixation durations around 180 ms after fixation onset. Furthermore, deviance distraction was not modulated by the lexical frequency of target words. In summary, fixation durations on the target words were longer immediately after the presentation of the deviant sound, but there was no evidence that it interfered with the lexical processing of these words. The present results are in line with the recent proposition that deviant sounds yield a temporary motor suppression and suggest that deviant sounds likely inhibit the programming of the next saccade.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1863-1875
Number of pages13
JournalQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
Volume72
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Eye Movements
Reading
Word Processing
Saccades

Cite this

Vasilev, Martin R. ; Parmentier, Fabrice Br ; Angele, Bernhard ; Kirkby, Julie A. / Distraction by deviant sounds during reading : An eye-movement study. In: Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006). 2019 ; Vol. 72, No. 7. pp. 1863-1875.
@article{50a2b15704bb461e9c3864c3b1fbe2df,
title = "Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study",
abstract = "Oddball studies have shown that sounds unexpectedly deviating from an otherwise repeated sequence capture attention away from the task at hand. While such distraction is typically regarded as potentially important in everyday life, previous work has so far not examined how deviant sounds affect performance on more complex daily tasks. In this study, we developed a new method to examine whether deviant sounds can disrupt reading performance by recording participants' eye movements. Participants read single sentences in silence and while listening to task-irrelevant sounds. In the latter condition, a 50-ms sound was played contingent on the fixation of five target words in the sentence. On most occasions, the same tone was presented (standard sound), whereas on rare and unexpected occasions it was replaced by white noise (deviant sound). The deviant sound resulted in significantly longer fixation durations on the target words relative to the standard sound. A time-course analysis showed that the deviant sound began to affect fixation durations around 180 ms after fixation onset. Furthermore, deviance distraction was not modulated by the lexical frequency of target words. In summary, fixation durations on the target words were longer immediately after the presentation of the deviant sound, but there was no evidence that it interfered with the lexical processing of these words. The present results are in line with the recent proposition that deviant sounds yield a temporary motor suppression and suggest that deviant sounds likely inhibit the programming of the next saccade.",
keywords = "auditory distractors, Deviance distraction, eye-movements, reading",
author = "Vasilev, {Martin R.} and Parmentier, {Fabrice Br} and Bernhard Angele and Kirkby, {Julie A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1747021818820816",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "1863--1875",
journal = "THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Psychology Press",
number = "7",

}

Distraction by deviant sounds during reading : An eye-movement study. / Vasilev, Martin R.; Parmentier, Fabrice Br; Angele, Bernhard; Kirkby, Julie A.

In: Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), Vol. 72, No. 7, 01.07.2019, p. 1863-1875.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distraction by deviant sounds during reading

T2 - An eye-movement study

AU - Vasilev, Martin R.

AU - Parmentier, Fabrice Br

AU - Angele, Bernhard

AU - Kirkby, Julie A.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Oddball studies have shown that sounds unexpectedly deviating from an otherwise repeated sequence capture attention away from the task at hand. While such distraction is typically regarded as potentially important in everyday life, previous work has so far not examined how deviant sounds affect performance on more complex daily tasks. In this study, we developed a new method to examine whether deviant sounds can disrupt reading performance by recording participants' eye movements. Participants read single sentences in silence and while listening to task-irrelevant sounds. In the latter condition, a 50-ms sound was played contingent on the fixation of five target words in the sentence. On most occasions, the same tone was presented (standard sound), whereas on rare and unexpected occasions it was replaced by white noise (deviant sound). The deviant sound resulted in significantly longer fixation durations on the target words relative to the standard sound. A time-course analysis showed that the deviant sound began to affect fixation durations around 180 ms after fixation onset. Furthermore, deviance distraction was not modulated by the lexical frequency of target words. In summary, fixation durations on the target words were longer immediately after the presentation of the deviant sound, but there was no evidence that it interfered with the lexical processing of these words. The present results are in line with the recent proposition that deviant sounds yield a temporary motor suppression and suggest that deviant sounds likely inhibit the programming of the next saccade.

AB - Oddball studies have shown that sounds unexpectedly deviating from an otherwise repeated sequence capture attention away from the task at hand. While such distraction is typically regarded as potentially important in everyday life, previous work has so far not examined how deviant sounds affect performance on more complex daily tasks. In this study, we developed a new method to examine whether deviant sounds can disrupt reading performance by recording participants' eye movements. Participants read single sentences in silence and while listening to task-irrelevant sounds. In the latter condition, a 50-ms sound was played contingent on the fixation of five target words in the sentence. On most occasions, the same tone was presented (standard sound), whereas on rare and unexpected occasions it was replaced by white noise (deviant sound). The deviant sound resulted in significantly longer fixation durations on the target words relative to the standard sound. A time-course analysis showed that the deviant sound began to affect fixation durations around 180 ms after fixation onset. Furthermore, deviance distraction was not modulated by the lexical frequency of target words. In summary, fixation durations on the target words were longer immediately after the presentation of the deviant sound, but there was no evidence that it interfered with the lexical processing of these words. The present results are in line with the recent proposition that deviant sounds yield a temporary motor suppression and suggest that deviant sounds likely inhibit the programming of the next saccade.

KW - auditory distractors

KW - Deviance distraction

KW - eye-movements

KW - reading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069268817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1747021818820816

DO - 10.1177/1747021818820816

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 1863

EP - 1875

JO - THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY

JF - THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 7

ER -