Distinct information critically distinguishes judgments of face familiarity and identity

M.L. Smith, B. Volna, Louise Ewing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2016 American Psychological Association.Accurately determining the familiarity of another and correctly establishing their identity are vital social skills. A considerable body of work has explored their perceptual and neural underpinnings and debate remains regarding whether they are dissociable, that is, separable parts of a dual process, or different aspects of a common retrieval process. Less is known about the specific visual information that guides familiarity judgments and how this compares to the information used to identify a face by name. Here we sought to establish the critical information underlying participants' judgments of facial familiarity and identification. We created a new standardized stimulus set comprising 6 personally familiar and 12 unfamiliar faces and applied the Bubbles reverse-correlation methodology to establish the information driving correct performance in each task. Results revealed that markedly different information underlies familiarity and identity judgments. When categorizing familiarity, participants relied more upon lower spatial-frequency, broad facial cues (eye and face shape) than when categorizing identity, which relied on fine details in the internal features (eyes and mouth). These results provide novel evidence of qualitatively distinct information use in familiarity and identification judgments and emphasize the importance of considering the task set for participants and their processing strategy when investigating face recognition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1770-1779
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume42
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Names
Cues
Mouth
Recognition (Psychology)
Familiarity
Facial Recognition
Social Skills
Stimulus
Reverse Correlation
Face Recognition
Bubble
Methodology
Dual Process
Spatial Frequency

Cite this

@article{07d136d396554906aedc2d51e6633e3b,
title = "Distinct information critically distinguishes judgments of face familiarity and identity",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2016 American Psychological Association.Accurately determining the familiarity of another and correctly establishing their identity are vital social skills. A considerable body of work has explored their perceptual and neural underpinnings and debate remains regarding whether they are dissociable, that is, separable parts of a dual process, or different aspects of a common retrieval process. Less is known about the specific visual information that guides familiarity judgments and how this compares to the information used to identify a face by name. Here we sought to establish the critical information underlying participants' judgments of facial familiarity and identification. We created a new standardized stimulus set comprising 6 personally familiar and 12 unfamiliar faces and applied the Bubbles reverse-correlation methodology to establish the information driving correct performance in each task. Results revealed that markedly different information underlies familiarity and identity judgments. When categorizing familiarity, participants relied more upon lower spatial-frequency, broad facial cues (eye and face shape) than when categorizing identity, which relied on fine details in the internal features (eyes and mouth). These results provide novel evidence of qualitatively distinct information use in familiarity and identification judgments and emphasize the importance of considering the task set for participants and their processing strategy when investigating face recognition.",
author = "M.L. Smith and B. Volna and Louise Ewing",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1037/xhp0000243",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1770--1779",
journal = "JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "11",

}

Distinct information critically distinguishes judgments of face familiarity and identity. / Smith, M.L.; Volna, B.; Ewing, Louise.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 42, No. 11, 2016, p. 1770-1779.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinct information critically distinguishes judgments of face familiarity and identity

AU - Smith, M.L.

AU - Volna, B.

AU - Ewing, Louise

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - © 2016 American Psychological Association.Accurately determining the familiarity of another and correctly establishing their identity are vital social skills. A considerable body of work has explored their perceptual and neural underpinnings and debate remains regarding whether they are dissociable, that is, separable parts of a dual process, or different aspects of a common retrieval process. Less is known about the specific visual information that guides familiarity judgments and how this compares to the information used to identify a face by name. Here we sought to establish the critical information underlying participants' judgments of facial familiarity and identification. We created a new standardized stimulus set comprising 6 personally familiar and 12 unfamiliar faces and applied the Bubbles reverse-correlation methodology to establish the information driving correct performance in each task. Results revealed that markedly different information underlies familiarity and identity judgments. When categorizing familiarity, participants relied more upon lower spatial-frequency, broad facial cues (eye and face shape) than when categorizing identity, which relied on fine details in the internal features (eyes and mouth). These results provide novel evidence of qualitatively distinct information use in familiarity and identification judgments and emphasize the importance of considering the task set for participants and their processing strategy when investigating face recognition.

AB - © 2016 American Psychological Association.Accurately determining the familiarity of another and correctly establishing their identity are vital social skills. A considerable body of work has explored their perceptual and neural underpinnings and debate remains regarding whether they are dissociable, that is, separable parts of a dual process, or different aspects of a common retrieval process. Less is known about the specific visual information that guides familiarity judgments and how this compares to the information used to identify a face by name. Here we sought to establish the critical information underlying participants' judgments of facial familiarity and identification. We created a new standardized stimulus set comprising 6 personally familiar and 12 unfamiliar faces and applied the Bubbles reverse-correlation methodology to establish the information driving correct performance in each task. Results revealed that markedly different information underlies familiarity and identity judgments. When categorizing familiarity, participants relied more upon lower spatial-frequency, broad facial cues (eye and face shape) than when categorizing identity, which relied on fine details in the internal features (eyes and mouth). These results provide novel evidence of qualitatively distinct information use in familiarity and identification judgments and emphasize the importance of considering the task set for participants and their processing strategy when investigating face recognition.

U2 - 10.1037/xhp0000243

DO - 10.1037/xhp0000243

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 1770

EP - 1779

JO - JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE

JF - JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 11

ER -