Distance to Market: Propinquity across In-store and Online Food Retailing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This qualitative research examines propinquityacross two grocery shopping situations– real (in-store) and virtual (online).Examining how the same consumers shopfor the same or similar commodities providesquasi-experimental conditions toexamine differences in shopping behaviour.Convergent interviews with 15 respondentsidentified that consumer reasons – expectationsof convenience, trust and satisfaction– for choosing online over in-store shoppingfall into three categories of propinquity:physical, temporal and relational. The mainreason consumers chose online shoppingwas convenience, to save time. To maximizetrust and satisfaction, consumers seldomchanged brand in online grocery shoppingsituations. The analysis also identified fourdistinct online shopper types – occasional,nasties, speciality and dependent – basedon perceptions of convenience and trustand satisfaction associated with virtualsituations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-245
JournalElectronic Markets
Volume15
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Food retailing
Grocery
Commodities
Shopping behavior
Consumer satisfaction
Qualitative research
Shopping

Cite this

@article{1a981b1127fc46f19f83cd5c49e8cd21,
title = "Distance to Market: Propinquity across In-store and Online Food Retailing",
abstract = "This qualitative research examines propinquityacross two grocery shopping situations– real (in-store) and virtual (online).Examining how the same consumers shopfor the same or similar commodities providesquasi-experimental conditions toexamine differences in shopping behaviour.Convergent interviews with 15 respondentsidentified that consumer reasons – expectationsof convenience, trust and satisfaction– for choosing online over in-store shoppingfall into three categories of propinquity:physical, temporal and relational. The mainreason consumers chose online shoppingwas convenience, to save time. To maximizetrust and satisfaction, consumers seldomchanged brand in online grocery shoppingsituations. The analysis also identified fourdistinct online shopper types – occasional,nasties, speciality and dependent – basedon perceptions of convenience and trustand satisfaction associated with virtualsituations.",
author = "G. Robertson and Jamie Murphy and Sharon Purchase",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "235--245",
journal = "Electronic Markets",
issn = "1019-6781",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Distance to Market: Propinquity across In-store and Online Food Retailing. / Robertson, G.; Murphy, Jamie; Purchase, Sharon.

In: Electronic Markets, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2005, p. 235-245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distance to Market: Propinquity across In-store and Online Food Retailing

AU - Robertson, G.

AU - Murphy, Jamie

AU - Purchase, Sharon

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This qualitative research examines propinquityacross two grocery shopping situations– real (in-store) and virtual (online).Examining how the same consumers shopfor the same or similar commodities providesquasi-experimental conditions toexamine differences in shopping behaviour.Convergent interviews with 15 respondentsidentified that consumer reasons – expectationsof convenience, trust and satisfaction– for choosing online over in-store shoppingfall into three categories of propinquity:physical, temporal and relational. The mainreason consumers chose online shoppingwas convenience, to save time. To maximizetrust and satisfaction, consumers seldomchanged brand in online grocery shoppingsituations. The analysis also identified fourdistinct online shopper types – occasional,nasties, speciality and dependent – basedon perceptions of convenience and trustand satisfaction associated with virtualsituations.

AB - This qualitative research examines propinquityacross two grocery shopping situations– real (in-store) and virtual (online).Examining how the same consumers shopfor the same or similar commodities providesquasi-experimental conditions toexamine differences in shopping behaviour.Convergent interviews with 15 respondentsidentified that consumer reasons – expectationsof convenience, trust and satisfaction– for choosing online over in-store shoppingfall into three categories of propinquity:physical, temporal and relational. The mainreason consumers chose online shoppingwas convenience, to save time. To maximizetrust and satisfaction, consumers seldomchanged brand in online grocery shoppingsituations. The analysis also identified fourdistinct online shopper types – occasional,nasties, speciality and dependent – basedon perceptions of convenience and trustand satisfaction associated with virtualsituations.

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 235

EP - 245

JO - Electronic Markets

JF - Electronic Markets

SN - 1019-6781

IS - 3

ER -