Discussion board moderators for online learning communities

Jose Van Den Akker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Copyright © 2015 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. Online discussion boards are used in various universities as an alternative to face to face discussion groups. But they are also subjected to and shaped by a materialist and managerialist agenda and notions of performativity (Ball, 2003) that tend to have a negative impact on relationships in learning environments. They are part of learning management systems (LMS) that focus on work performance management, educational optimisation and more advanced centralised control, underpinned by the old idea of human beings as static and easy to categorise identities. The impetus and effect is entropic, motivated by investment in people to yield high returns in various ways. This article problematises those neo-liberal agendas to then talk about options online discussion board moderators can consider. First describing the incident that motivated writing this article, the discussion deliberates the idea of teaching and learning in a computerised world and looks at the idea of online sharing of information versus communication. The discussion then looks into what is useful for a postmodern world and brings forward the idea of integral theory and Beck and Cowan's (2006) perspective on meme systems that may assist online discussion board moderators in creating an intimate, multilayered and emergent community or Gemeinschaft.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-133
JournalInternational Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Discussion board moderators for online learning communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this