Discourse and Pragmatic Functions of the Dalabon ‘Ergative’ Case-marker*

Ellison Luk, Maïa Ponsonnet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article discusses the distribution and function of a suffix that has been labelled ‘ergative’ in the literature on Dalabon, a Gunwinyguan (non-Pama-Nyungan) language of south-western Arnhem Land. Our first-hand data reveal that although this marker (-yih) more frequently occurs on A arguments of multivalent clauses, it also appears with significant frequency on S arguments of monovalent clauses, particularly with the verb root yin ‘to say, to think, to do’. We explain this non-canonical distribution with a co-dependent analysis of its discourse and pragmatic functions, summarized by the principle ‘mark out the unexpected referent’, following McGregor’s Expected Actor Principle. These functions differ slightly according to clause type. For both types, the marker has a discourse function of ‘mark out the non-topical referent’: either an A argument that sufficiently threatens the construal of local topics, or an S referent after a long period of deferred topichood (particularly speaker referents). The marker also has a correlating pragmatic function of ‘mark out the contrary referent’: either an A participant acting against the motivations and expectations of other (topical) referents (or of the speaker), or an S participant with an unusual stance or speech content.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-328
Number of pages42
JournalAustralian Journal of Linguistics
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

pragmatics
discourse
Case Marker
Pragmatic Functions
Referent
Ergative Case
Discourse Functions
language
Clause

Cite this

@article{43fa3561ef1440ca96a91ffe4cc3ce41,
title = "Discourse and Pragmatic Functions of the Dalabon ‘Ergative’ Case-marker*",
abstract = "This article discusses the distribution and function of a suffix that has been labelled ‘ergative’ in the literature on Dalabon, a Gunwinyguan (non-Pama-Nyungan) language of south-western Arnhem Land. Our first-hand data reveal that although this marker (-yih) more frequently occurs on A arguments of multivalent clauses, it also appears with significant frequency on S arguments of monovalent clauses, particularly with the verb root yin ‘to say, to think, to do’. We explain this non-canonical distribution with a co-dependent analysis of its discourse and pragmatic functions, summarized by the principle ‘mark out the unexpected referent’, following McGregor’s Expected Actor Principle. These functions differ slightly according to clause type. For both types, the marker has a discourse function of ‘mark out the non-topical referent’: either an A argument that sufficiently threatens the construal of local topics, or an S referent after a long period of deferred topichood (particularly speaker referents). The marker also has a correlating pragmatic function of ‘mark out the contrary referent’: either an A participant acting against the motivations and expectations of other (topical) referents (or of the speaker), or an S participant with an unusual stance or speech content.",
keywords = "Case-marking, Gunwinyguan, Information Structure, Nominal Reference, Optional Ergative, Topicality, Transitivity",
author = "Ellison Luk and Ma{\"i}a Ponsonnet",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/07268602.2019.1623758",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "287--328",
journal = "Australian Journal of Linguistics",
issn = "0726-8602",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Discourse and Pragmatic Functions of the Dalabon ‘Ergative’ Case-marker*. / Luk, Ellison; Ponsonnet, Maïa.

In: Australian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 39, No. 3, 03.07.2019, p. 287-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discourse and Pragmatic Functions of the Dalabon ‘Ergative’ Case-marker*

AU - Luk, Ellison

AU - Ponsonnet, Maïa

PY - 2019/7/3

Y1 - 2019/7/3

N2 - This article discusses the distribution and function of a suffix that has been labelled ‘ergative’ in the literature on Dalabon, a Gunwinyguan (non-Pama-Nyungan) language of south-western Arnhem Land. Our first-hand data reveal that although this marker (-yih) more frequently occurs on A arguments of multivalent clauses, it also appears with significant frequency on S arguments of monovalent clauses, particularly with the verb root yin ‘to say, to think, to do’. We explain this non-canonical distribution with a co-dependent analysis of its discourse and pragmatic functions, summarized by the principle ‘mark out the unexpected referent’, following McGregor’s Expected Actor Principle. These functions differ slightly according to clause type. For both types, the marker has a discourse function of ‘mark out the non-topical referent’: either an A argument that sufficiently threatens the construal of local topics, or an S referent after a long period of deferred topichood (particularly speaker referents). The marker also has a correlating pragmatic function of ‘mark out the contrary referent’: either an A participant acting against the motivations and expectations of other (topical) referents (or of the speaker), or an S participant with an unusual stance or speech content.

AB - This article discusses the distribution and function of a suffix that has been labelled ‘ergative’ in the literature on Dalabon, a Gunwinyguan (non-Pama-Nyungan) language of south-western Arnhem Land. Our first-hand data reveal that although this marker (-yih) more frequently occurs on A arguments of multivalent clauses, it also appears with significant frequency on S arguments of monovalent clauses, particularly with the verb root yin ‘to say, to think, to do’. We explain this non-canonical distribution with a co-dependent analysis of its discourse and pragmatic functions, summarized by the principle ‘mark out the unexpected referent’, following McGregor’s Expected Actor Principle. These functions differ slightly according to clause type. For both types, the marker has a discourse function of ‘mark out the non-topical referent’: either an A argument that sufficiently threatens the construal of local topics, or an S referent after a long period of deferred topichood (particularly speaker referents). The marker also has a correlating pragmatic function of ‘mark out the contrary referent’: either an A participant acting against the motivations and expectations of other (topical) referents (or of the speaker), or an S participant with an unusual stance or speech content.

KW - Case-marking

KW - Gunwinyguan

KW - Information Structure

KW - Nominal Reference

KW - Optional Ergative

KW - Topicality

KW - Transitivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068572907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07268602.2019.1623758

DO - 10.1080/07268602.2019.1623758

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 287

EP - 328

JO - Australian Journal of Linguistics

JF - Australian Journal of Linguistics

SN - 0726-8602

IS - 3

ER -