Different strategies of Lotus japonicus, L. corniculatus and L. tenuis to deal with complete submergence at seedling stage

G. G. Striker, R. F. Izaguirre, M. E. Manzur, A. A. Grimoldi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two main strategies allow plants to deal with submergence: (i) escape from below water by means of shoot elongation, or (ii) remaining quiescent under the water until water subsides and then resume growth. We investigated these strategies in seedlings of Lotus japonicus, L. corniculatus and L. tenuis subjected to control and submergence for 12days, with a subsequent 30-day recovery period. All three species survived submergence but used different strategies. Submerged seedlings of L. japonicus exhibited an escape strategy (emerging from water) as a result of preferential carbon allocation towards shoot mass and lengthening, in detriment to root growth. In contrast, seedlings of L. corniculatus and L. tenuis became quiescent, with no biomass accumulation, no new unfolding of leaves and no shoot elongation. Upon de-submergence, seedlings of L. japonicus had the lowest recovery growth (a biomass and shoot height 58% and 40% less than controls, respectively), L. corniculatus was intermediate and L. tenuis showed the greatest recovery growth. Previously submerged seedlings of L. tenuis did not differ from their controls, either in final shoot biomass or shoot height. Thus, for the studied species, quiescence appears to be an adequate strategy for tolerance of short-term (i.e., 12days) complete submergence, being consistent with field observations of L. tenuis colonisation of flood-prone environments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-55
Number of pages6
JournalPlant Biology
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Different strategies of Lotus japonicus, L. corniculatus and L. tenuis to deal with complete submergence at seedling stage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this