Differences in the escape response of a grapsid crab in the field and in the laboratory

Jan Hemmi, D. Tomsic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Escape behaviours of prey animals are frequently used to study the neural control of behaviour. Escape responses are robust and fast, and can be reliably evoked under both field and laboratory conditions. Many escape responses are not as simple as previously suggested, however, and are often modulated by a range of contextual factors. To date it has been unclear to what extent behaviours studied in controlled laboratory experiments are actually representative of the behaviours that occur under more natural conditions. Here, we have used the model species Neohelice granulata, a grapsid crab, to show that there are significant differences between the crabs' escape responses in the field compared with those previously documented in laboratory experiments. These differences are consistent with contextual adjustments such as the availability of a refuge and have clear consequences for understanding the crabs' neural control of behaviour. Furthermore, the methodology used in this study mirrors the methodology previously used in fiddler crab research, allowing us to show that the previously documented differences in escape responses between these grapsid species are real and substantial. Neohelice granulata's responses are delayed and more controlled. Overall, the results highlight the adaptability and flexibility of escape behaviours and provide further evidence that the neural control of behaviour needs to be addressed in both the laboratory and field context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3499-3507
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Experimental Biology
Volume218
Issue number21
Early online date18 Sep 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Nov 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in the escape response of a grapsid crab in the field and in the laboratory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this