Did Bridget Jones Really Liberate Us?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

Abstract

Reprinted from "Did Bridget Jones really liberate us?" Herizons 16:1 (1 July 2002), 26-29, which is in turn an excerpt of the book "Overloaded: Pop Culture and the Future of Feminism" (Women's Press, 2000), ISBN-10: 0704346176.

While men are in crisis, many women continue to flick through the glossies and self-help manuals in an attempt to find their own problems, their own complex identities, reflected there. If some male commentators are suggesting that women, in their will to power, have taken a little bit of men's essential selves with them, women are recognising that 'having it all' demands some complex navigation between what is seen as masculine and what is seen as feminine.
The world of work and public life is so steeped in its masculine image and language that it is difficult for women not to become infected, and as a result be perceived as unhealthily 'masculine' for simply trying to do their work as well as a man. This conflict is echoed out in the film Working Girl (1988), where Sigourney Weaver's ruthless and competitive management style is set against Melanie Griffiths' softer reconciliation between her drive for professional recognition and her sexually alluring style of dress--an antidote to the shoulder-padded 'power-dressing' of the early eighties. In fact, this 'unsisterly' conflict is played out as an unseemly battle over the one glittering prize that indicates you've really 'arrived'--getting the man.
Good men are hard to find, if the common-sense aphorisms of popular culture are to be believed; in fact any available men seem to be in short supply. Belief in this 'fact' shapes the agenda for women's magazines. Having a career is all well and good, but not if it is at the expense of finding Mr. Right. All warn implicitly that the heady days of youth, glamour and social freedom are all too soon replaced by the lengthy twilight of terminal single status.
The 'singleton' is, perhaps, the elder sister of the ladette. Once the 'snogging and shagging' of the early years are over and she has reached a certain level in her career, the biological imperative to 'nest' takes over. It is only then that the singleton realises her success in other fields has been at the expense of the one thing that 'really' matters--finding a man. The singleton par excellence is, of course, Bridget Jones.
Item Details
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationContemporary Literary Criticism: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Today's Novelists, Poets, Playwrights, Short Story Writers, Scriptwriters, & Other Creative Writers
EditorsJeffrey Hunter
Place of PublicationDetroit, USA
PublisherGale
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)0787679879
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Masculine
Common Sense
Public Life
Aphorism
Will to Power
Sister
Popular Culture
Self-help
Women's Magazines
Glamour
Agenda
Management Styles
Glittering
Navigation
Reconciliation
Language
Elders
Commentators

Cite this

Whelehan, I. (2006). Did Bridget Jones Really Liberate Us? In J. Hunter (Ed.), Contemporary Literary Criticism: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Today's Novelists, Poets, Playwrights, Short Story Writers, Scriptwriters, & Other Creative Writers Detroit, USA: Gale.
Whelehan, Imelda. / Did Bridget Jones Really Liberate Us?. Contemporary Literary Criticism: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Today's Novelists, Poets, Playwrights, Short Story Writers, Scriptwriters, & Other Creative Writers. editor / Jeffrey Hunter. Detroit, USA : Gale, 2006.
@inbook{03cf1cf540724e32b856ab2e655218f5,
title = "Did Bridget Jones Really Liberate Us?",
abstract = "Reprinted from {"}Did Bridget Jones really liberate us?{"} Herizons 16:1 (1 July 2002), 26-29, which is in turn an excerpt of the book {"}Overloaded: Pop Culture and the Future of Feminism{"} (Women's Press, 2000), ISBN-10: 0704346176.While men are in crisis, many women continue to flick through the glossies and self-help manuals in an attempt to find their own problems, their own complex identities, reflected there. If some male commentators are suggesting that women, in their will to power, have taken a little bit of men's essential selves with them, women are recognising that 'having it all' demands some complex navigation between what is seen as masculine and what is seen as feminine.The world of work and public life is so steeped in its masculine image and language that it is difficult for women not to become infected, and as a result be perceived as unhealthily 'masculine' for simply trying to do their work as well as a man. This conflict is echoed out in the film Working Girl (1988), where Sigourney Weaver's ruthless and competitive management style is set against Melanie Griffiths' softer reconciliation between her drive for professional recognition and her sexually alluring style of dress--an antidote to the shoulder-padded 'power-dressing' of the early eighties. In fact, this 'unsisterly' conflict is played out as an unseemly battle over the one glittering prize that indicates you've really 'arrived'--getting the man.Good men are hard to find, if the common-sense aphorisms of popular culture are to be believed; in fact any available men seem to be in short supply. Belief in this 'fact' shapes the agenda for women's magazines. Having a career is all well and good, but not if it is at the expense of finding Mr. Right. All warn implicitly that the heady days of youth, glamour and social freedom are all too soon replaced by the lengthy twilight of terminal single status.The 'singleton' is, perhaps, the elder sister of the ladette. Once the 'snogging and shagging' of the early years are over and she has reached a certain level in her career, the biological imperative to 'nest' takes over. It is only then that the singleton realises her success in other fields has been at the expense of the one thing that 'really' matters--finding a man. The singleton par excellence is, of course, Bridget Jones.Item Details",
author = "Imelda Whelehan",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
isbn = "0787679879",
editor = "Jeffrey Hunter",
booktitle = "Contemporary Literary Criticism: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Today's Novelists, Poets, Playwrights, Short Story Writers, Scriptwriters, & Other Creative Writers",
publisher = "Gale",

}

Whelehan, I 2006, Did Bridget Jones Really Liberate Us? in J Hunter (ed.), Contemporary Literary Criticism: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Today's Novelists, Poets, Playwrights, Short Story Writers, Scriptwriters, & Other Creative Writers. Gale, Detroit, USA.

Did Bridget Jones Really Liberate Us? / Whelehan, Imelda.

Contemporary Literary Criticism: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Today's Novelists, Poets, Playwrights, Short Story Writers, Scriptwriters, & Other Creative Writers. ed. / Jeffrey Hunter. Detroit, USA : Gale, 2006.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Did Bridget Jones Really Liberate Us?

AU - Whelehan, Imelda

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Reprinted from "Did Bridget Jones really liberate us?" Herizons 16:1 (1 July 2002), 26-29, which is in turn an excerpt of the book "Overloaded: Pop Culture and the Future of Feminism" (Women's Press, 2000), ISBN-10: 0704346176.While men are in crisis, many women continue to flick through the glossies and self-help manuals in an attempt to find their own problems, their own complex identities, reflected there. If some male commentators are suggesting that women, in their will to power, have taken a little bit of men's essential selves with them, women are recognising that 'having it all' demands some complex navigation between what is seen as masculine and what is seen as feminine.The world of work and public life is so steeped in its masculine image and language that it is difficult for women not to become infected, and as a result be perceived as unhealthily 'masculine' for simply trying to do their work as well as a man. This conflict is echoed out in the film Working Girl (1988), where Sigourney Weaver's ruthless and competitive management style is set against Melanie Griffiths' softer reconciliation between her drive for professional recognition and her sexually alluring style of dress--an antidote to the shoulder-padded 'power-dressing' of the early eighties. In fact, this 'unsisterly' conflict is played out as an unseemly battle over the one glittering prize that indicates you've really 'arrived'--getting the man.Good men are hard to find, if the common-sense aphorisms of popular culture are to be believed; in fact any available men seem to be in short supply. Belief in this 'fact' shapes the agenda for women's magazines. Having a career is all well and good, but not if it is at the expense of finding Mr. Right. All warn implicitly that the heady days of youth, glamour and social freedom are all too soon replaced by the lengthy twilight of terminal single status.The 'singleton' is, perhaps, the elder sister of the ladette. Once the 'snogging and shagging' of the early years are over and she has reached a certain level in her career, the biological imperative to 'nest' takes over. It is only then that the singleton realises her success in other fields has been at the expense of the one thing that 'really' matters--finding a man. The singleton par excellence is, of course, Bridget Jones.Item Details

AB - Reprinted from "Did Bridget Jones really liberate us?" Herizons 16:1 (1 July 2002), 26-29, which is in turn an excerpt of the book "Overloaded: Pop Culture and the Future of Feminism" (Women's Press, 2000), ISBN-10: 0704346176.While men are in crisis, many women continue to flick through the glossies and self-help manuals in an attempt to find their own problems, their own complex identities, reflected there. If some male commentators are suggesting that women, in their will to power, have taken a little bit of men's essential selves with them, women are recognising that 'having it all' demands some complex navigation between what is seen as masculine and what is seen as feminine.The world of work and public life is so steeped in its masculine image and language that it is difficult for women not to become infected, and as a result be perceived as unhealthily 'masculine' for simply trying to do their work as well as a man. This conflict is echoed out in the film Working Girl (1988), where Sigourney Weaver's ruthless and competitive management style is set against Melanie Griffiths' softer reconciliation between her drive for professional recognition and her sexually alluring style of dress--an antidote to the shoulder-padded 'power-dressing' of the early eighties. In fact, this 'unsisterly' conflict is played out as an unseemly battle over the one glittering prize that indicates you've really 'arrived'--getting the man.Good men are hard to find, if the common-sense aphorisms of popular culture are to be believed; in fact any available men seem to be in short supply. Belief in this 'fact' shapes the agenda for women's magazines. Having a career is all well and good, but not if it is at the expense of finding Mr. Right. All warn implicitly that the heady days of youth, glamour and social freedom are all too soon replaced by the lengthy twilight of terminal single status.The 'singleton' is, perhaps, the elder sister of the ladette. Once the 'snogging and shagging' of the early years are over and she has reached a certain level in her career, the biological imperative to 'nest' takes over. It is only then that the singleton realises her success in other fields has been at the expense of the one thing that 'really' matters--finding a man. The singleton par excellence is, of course, Bridget Jones.Item Details

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0787679879

BT - Contemporary Literary Criticism: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Today's Novelists, Poets, Playwrights, Short Story Writers, Scriptwriters, & Other Creative Writers

A2 - Hunter, Jeffrey

PB - Gale

CY - Detroit, USA

ER -

Whelehan I. Did Bridget Jones Really Liberate Us? In Hunter J, editor, Contemporary Literary Criticism: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Today's Novelists, Poets, Playwrights, Short Story Writers, Scriptwriters, & Other Creative Writers. Detroit, USA: Gale. 2006